Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B70C43217 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235746AbhLOUX5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:23:57 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:34731 "EHLO mail-ot1-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234075AbhLOUX4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:23:56 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f41.google.com with SMTP id x19-20020a9d7053000000b0055c8b39420bso26361375otj.1; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:23:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rDc/m0z81usLrHmVxQTbPcJpFGLlwccuEGUofI1rnCY=; b=bauiFRNf87k9FXx7JUwt1/rv/jjFMHZnGHcRUpDgSeQA4ovjkk0dimXbBDYKhJQXtW K7KlCB9tdpCv/7lshj7tlogGAIJ7bsYAhsroIYhDBmr6WiHDEbJxRNr0uqV8DvuCmi3w r9XJidB9hA7k8NJW8MmHbFof4oTTcxqQRUNeBAmah9jJ9sRme4MJqQ6eXtWmSAZBZEIf cpY4LC45iCfZ1Jb2OMaoiIvJFY9i1psIXMuhajqMhS+2CReiecrwxFkaymReDKorL4IU ipDVWVJUdtI1RQCal6ym3UuiaDwj85EaNx9F0s9pjcw+UE6XGtk+33N5SsP6rr1ceFO7 lJSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vmvA1Y0K++boRArU4SIx7pvaS0QiNBWoGoN/+kl7/8Qscj0hM yYkZ4NBQqCO3iUbcZRxO4g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2REterkzgVl+l3L2vynJmWoml8AEBu3SIbeJvyBZUECUO9F4YSXSi72K4S6J35Z5cPCOHaA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6058:: with SMTP id v24mr10028046otj.296.1639599835370; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:23:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-148-213.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.148.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm620937otb.4.2021.12.15.12.23.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:23:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 1776034 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:23:53 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:23:53 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: David Heidelberg Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Caleb Connolly , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross , Satya Priya , Alessandro Zummo , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx-rtc: update register numbers Message-ID: References: <20211213192946.111320-1-david@ixit.cz> <1639437829.348405.1773613.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org> <7I544R.923UO8WZHK48@ixit.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7I544R.923UO8WZHK48@ixit.cz> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:22:55PM +0100, David Heidelberg wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 13 2021 at 17:23:49 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:29:45 +0100, David Heidelberg wrote: > > > Extend registers up to 2, also document their names. > > > > > > Also fixes warnings generated by `make > > > qcom/sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dtb`: > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dt.yaml: rtc@6000: > > > reg: [[24576], [24832]] is too long > > > From schema: > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dt.yaml: rtc@6000: > > > 'reg-names' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > > > From schema: > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml | 9 > > > ++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the > > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is > > incorrect. These may not be new warnings. > > > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check. > > This will change in the future. > > > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1567467 > > > > > > rtc@11d: compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('qcom,pm8921-rtc' > > was unexpected) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615-wp8548-mangoh-green.dt.yaml > > > > rtc@11d: compatible: ['qcom,pm8018-rtc', 'qcom,pm8921-rtc'] is too long > > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615-wp8548-mangoh-green.dt.yaml > > > Would you consider safe, if I sent patch to remove redundant > `qcom,pm8921-rtc` from arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi? I don't know. Depends if anything uses that and doesn't know about 'qcom,pm8018-rtc'. Rob