Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:07:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:07:26 -0500 Received: from [195.66.192.167] ([195.66.192.167]:60935 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:07:16 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: vda To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Asm style Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:07:03 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01112123070300.05447@manta> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm using GCC 3.0.1 and seeing "multi-line literals are deprecated". Since a patch is necessary for that (and someone submitted it already) I'd like to hear from big kernel guys what asm statement style to use: asm( " cmd r,r\n" "lbl: cmd r,r\n" " cmd r,r\n" : spec : spec ); [variable width for labels? I don't like it] or asm( " cmd r,r\n" "lbl: cmd r,r\n" " cmd r,r\n" : spec : spec ); [better. But \n's are ugly] or #define NL "\n" asm( " cmd r,r" NL "lbl: cmd r,r" NL " cmd r,r" NL : spec : spec ); [I like this: \n doesn't interfere with args] or what? -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/