Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C200C433FE for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235617AbhLQLk5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:40:57 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:47601 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233856AbhLQLk4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:40:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1639741255; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X0AgJWYtCde0wRE4G15AOz/150w1GAh7NwKm3oYeCMg=; b=X/8C3YaiLZQUBJ7Xl8A9oEa7xCxc88woSjhAR8TLM17CQ6QAYildtHOH2hzYSfHSJLKy8F tnYIcj0V8miDosAnL7C1nEJf/jZoWU1EvsVR/K0PnuCwxkj2ijyhe6ct07h7TW1mErW3/K nulOH7A1S9nXkNpogT1bQy4QOlw9Z+U= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-608-HtHtT5zVOwa-EhoynN2tTA-1; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:40:54 -0500 X-MC-Unique: HtHtT5zVOwa-EhoynN2tTA-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id b15-20020aa7c6cf000000b003e7cf0f73daso1654021eds.22 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 03:40:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X0AgJWYtCde0wRE4G15AOz/150w1GAh7NwKm3oYeCMg=; b=AnjrBjXJuAFFvYsNju6aB+F8s2ltWkBgmU/rU8RJuN2ZGJo5j/JP4S/r6o0Qv9+h6P qzFogm3gHZemG9srXZPDBGWiKgDLKmQhzN32g6qhGEMdsAx+//XwcORnBuSuSGSGfoex AjyLjobdDdJYWKGSy+yHG+L+/oB3eOhGdHR35qZBKHXjwMMM7UQn7uZDPvh8DeQc1QDn lGWcYKTcBs9UK1hqCtNZaFbCHSE5fGPMvgxJ2lKSqC2zPe3qrehaU2dm9Q8ug1oz5d6C hYD2heRyS+rwI2DhuOVldsfXkseiQItdTOWcKhlU7YBMABxCvibhWvaIFZ24sqmPZfUz 4lsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+A/R/ev8oW8291VNR7Bf1C81HDe0JFwBFM+0BK3wFXmVQxgg5 kx66ZIFGGlB0E4AeTHHY72eNgUq2birsjY7dGltOajitCIefKJ1HMqzb1esHqW8gMX6xfXE0K01 8ZhtXaBvXrLhQ4pJYhQob5ImofmURyBOru+qFFydb X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2072:: with SMTP id bd18mr2460856edb.280.1639741252702; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 03:40:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw45eK5HN9dZm9QJ6dhYB1cvicXLS3gMkFP24LvySJqi+UXSYhuRxoj/ScWxBQet1UoE0pILvIvnvdEhfqcN8s= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2072:: with SMTP id bd18mr2460843edb.280.1639741252580; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 03:40:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211217113507.76f852f2@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20211217113507.76f852f2@canb.auug.org.au> From: David Wysochanski Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:40:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfs-anna tree with the fscache tree To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust , NFS Mailing List , David Howells , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 7:35 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the nfs-anna tree got conflicts in: > > fs/nfs/fscache.c > fs/nfs/fscache.h > fs/nfs/fscache-index.c > > between commit: > > 882ff66585ec ("nfs: Convert to new fscache volume/cookie API") > > from the fscache tree and commits: > > e89edabcb3d4 ("NFS: Remove remaining usages of NFSDBG_FSCACHE") > 0d20bd7faac9 ("NFS: Cleanup usage of nfs_inode in fscache interface and handle i_size properly") > 4a0574909596 ("NFS: Rename fscache read and write pages functions") > 3b779545aa01 ("NFS: Convert NFS fscache enable/disable dfprintks to tracepoints") > b9077ca60a13 ("NFS: Replace dfprintks with tracepoints in fscache read and write page functions") > 416de7e7eeb6 ("NFS: Remove remaining dfprintks related to fscache cookies") > fcb692b98976 ("NFS: Use nfs_i_fscache() consistently within NFS fscache code") > Anna, feel free to drop these from your tree to avoid the conflicts with the rest of your tree and dhowells fscache-rewrite patchset. > from the nfs-anna tree. > > I had no idea how to fix this all up, so I just dropped the nfs-anna > tree for today. Please get together and coordinate thses changes. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell