Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29985C433F5 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237750AbhLQPAX (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:00:23 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:58430 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237743AbhLQPAV (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:00:21 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572B11435; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 07:00:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.83.65] (unknown [10.57.83.65]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 156CF3F774; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 07:00:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5c509114-f383-2876-36ae-8648d886a09e@arm.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:00:18 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] perf test: Shell - only run .sh shell files to skip other files To: carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, mike.leach@linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org, inux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org References: <20211215160403.69264-1-carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> <20211215160403.69264-2-carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> From: Suzuki K Poulose In-Reply-To: <20211215160403.69264-2-carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15/12/2021 16:03, carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com wrote: > From: Carsten Haitzler > > You edit your scripts in the tests and end up with your usual shell > backup files with ~ or .bak or something else at the end, but then your > next perf test run wants to run the backups too. You might also have perf > .data files in the directory or something else undesireable as well. You end > up chasing which test is the one you edited and the backup and have to keep > removing all the backup files, so automatically skip any files that are > not plain *.sh scripts to limit the time wasted in chasing ghosts. > > Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler > --- > tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c > index ece272b55587..849737ead9fd 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c > @@ -297,7 +297,20 @@ static const char *shell_test__description(char *description, size_t size, > for (int __i = 0; __i < nr && (ent = entlist[__i]); __i++) \ > if (!is_directory(base, ent) && \ > is_executable_file(base, ent) && \ > - ent->d_name[0] != '.') > + ent->d_name[0] != '.' && \ > + (shell_file_is_sh(ent->d_name) == 0)) > + > +static int shell_file_is_sh(const char *file) nit: In line with the other "helpers", could this be: is_shell_file_sh() or even is_shell_script() ? Also, for consistency, could this be bool, like the other helpers ? i.e., returns true when the condition matches ? Suzuki > +{ > + const char *ext; > + > + ext = strchr(file, '.'); > + if (!ext) > + return -1; > + if (!strcmp(ext, ".sh")) > + return 0; > + return -1; > +} > > static const char *shell_tests__dir(char *path, size_t size) > {