Message-ID: <23ee6e80-b857-11ab-1d80-c8b1f4ff6f04@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:05:34 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/32] KVM: s390: expose the guest zPCI interpretation
 facility
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
        schnelle@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com,
        hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
        frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
        vneethv@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com,
        thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20211207205743.150299-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
 <20211207205743.150299-17-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211207205743.150299-17-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


Am 07.12.21 um 21:57 schrieb Matthew Rosato:
> This facility will be used to enable interpretive execution of zPCI
> instructions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index c8fe9b7c2395..09991d05c871 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -2751,6 +2751,10 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>   		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 147);
>   		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_list, 147);
>   	}
> +	if (sclp.has_zpci_interp && test_facility(69)) {
> +		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 69);
> +		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_list, 69);
> +	}


Do we need the setting of these stfle bits somewhere? I think QEMU sets them as well for the guest.
We only need this when the kernel probes for this (test_kvm_facility) But then the question is, shouldnt
we then simply check for sclp bits in those places?
See also patch 19. We need to build it in a way that allows VSIE support later on.

>   
>   	if (css_general_characteristics.aiv && test_facility(65))
>   		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 65);
>