Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:01:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:00:59 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:1266 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:00:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:00:46 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Helge Hafting Cc: Thomas Hood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: x bit for dirs: misfeature? Message-ID: <20011121150046.A4037@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Helge Hafting , Thomas Hood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1006272306.9039.18.camel@thanatos> <3BFB831F.49284E42@idb.hist.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BFB831F.49284E42@idb.hist.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:34:07AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > Thomas Hood wrote: > > However, a decent reason for having separate r and x > > is that "r--" directories _do_ make sense. When a > > directory is "r--", its contents can be _listed_ but the > > directory cannot be browsed. Observe: // Thomas Hood > > But is that useful? > Sure, I can list filenames. I can't get at filesize > or permissions. I can't open the files. How > is that useful? Of course locking people > out is useful, but why should they need to read > the filenames? > To taunt them? ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/