Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD4EC433F5 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233705AbhLSM3l (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 07:29:41 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:39856 "EHLO mail-wr1-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231719AbhLSM3k (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 07:29:40 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id s1so8785364wra.6 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 04:29:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=i/nOnLrUtXLrdXzK8zEtzWYdMs/JTFryzu35YjyVQIs=; b=TG1oa45Fpdyl742OQAhrkQc96uWKEvMHy/bQ6rNCxf/skKKIqht7QzFvozcKQD14m4 EuCt02q/uPEiAfI6HZ1tdtfC6N/8EwGw91J7CrQrCaA+v99OpWioqXKxl2A+XHTcU5Nt jbN7Hhi4Cyl5QuEu0kuvtuHeaC0khn5tfkeOBI5n5HvgmRb/NFfqnCgd1nsAYLW0qmEH m2LEAlZzGc2mzdhOof0Z1uO7cbhb+sniPDgODm15g5OZMeBg8UirJHoa+JmkkoDGKJh5 sbkdoREILhTWwBY4AM0RoAIeNY8mHmx9H0Xt/YTA5JdYB84b2BQsUq5bJJhEYciek8EF YV9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PSn8wEBdH0uRULZ9E/D8XMVwlda6H0RgN7qAO6U4ACM/8ONez Q2Ke8dtRTdkYwp1YVZ7HP2EOwwa6cDU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysFM6BWBZTOk5G+YgnuuZ4kNGbN46pkZcNsmQK1+ha5AI4dHgEynWCKy5DDVZEsNzKYaegNg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8b47:: with SMTP id v7mr9586156wra.715.1639916979473; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 04:29:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from liuwe-devbox-debian-v2 ([51.145.34.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c187sm13879999wme.33.2021.12.19.04.29.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 04:29:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:29:37 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: kernel test robot Cc: Tianyu Lan , llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wei Liu , Long Li , Michael Kelley Subject: Re: [hyperv:hyperv-next 4/5] drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c:2082:29: warning: shift count >= width of type Message-ID: <20211219122937.7zi3etrcl6rpob3t@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2> References: <202112181827.o3X7GmHz-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202112181827.o3X7GmHz-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 06:20:43PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyperv/linux.git hyperv-next > head: 19fd7ca00201c0525452dcf5a490e4b01674ef4c > commit: 6327882f7b4a476ea902de4bee5657f1028d6859 [4/5] scsi: storvsc: Add Isolation VM support for storvsc driver > config: x86_64-randconfig-a013-20211216 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211218/202112181827.o3X7GmHz-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4c9e31a4814592bbda7153833e46728dc7b21100) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyperv/linux.git/commit/?id=6327882f7b4a476ea902de4bee5657f1028d6859 > git remote add hyperv https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyperv/linux.git > git fetch --no-tags hyperv hyperv-next > git checkout 6327882f7b4a476ea902de4bee5657f1028d6859 > # save the config file to linux build tree > mkdir build_dir > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/hv/ > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c:2082:29: warning: shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] > static u64 vmbus_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/dma-mapping.h:76:54: note: expanded from macro 'DMA_BIT_MASK' > #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) > ^ ~~~ I don't think there is anything wrong with the code. When n is 64 the problematic expression is not evaluated. Wei.