Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF727C4332F for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 14:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235940AbhLSOyg (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 09:54:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56556 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233146AbhLSOyf (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 09:54:35 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EDE1C061574; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 06:54:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id z5so28081974edd.3; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 06:54:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=97q7sg0TD+CFNjCZu+yqt+zOFqMiYIbWb3t36ZIak30=; b=pFN23c6IE7GHNyY1lrHvdR6qK+ws6rcviNC/bAeDyKxtjctrPyWsEBHD9px91B4TFU XRqcKkBPN7TfDLY2hZ6TQMHtVESzgq0DShrU2vEuUTIVmA7GnDtqJ9GAaN8MaG+x0uKV MAW2VTfa1ReT6Ie6NrgSfz/CWqljNEg4cHUUo/AxBlnanGPZN68m4q6x7AngWcOmo4gV WjYYzn8izyiRudP6U2ttfthE7qA92G4TDzzCb8GX78/Ey7OJnDXIvNzD8Z+qysuSlb1a ApnhaSH7v9iMJ7NpjQrIbZjVqUcIt2BrIW3AquJqVXaf82gxGr/VfPzmcmGQabu4rzrd quCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=97q7sg0TD+CFNjCZu+yqt+zOFqMiYIbWb3t36ZIak30=; b=pR1BSIHdXUv8x1Kp5tbPNXn82J3j/zGBHmKf3HbYe7JI1vE5rgK8dc6NBM1gP+sDtX 2R95yxbAnW7upIatD0tWLAxGRYVRMofaiT/u3ooqvbCu/Whc+8wBVCykl1tRzOk/YQoy qxQ7S+8PkuNctzslh3FQivlAuuu3RN+/kB2fnbDxSAHDrWcqRzBqP/yfZXpXDDGa437f 5jLeuLXIZOIDYlQ1b4z6S/nt37mHAPfNTuToljyw5RgT7BqNnxH5WrpTFGlxnKTyyh0D XRaeBlbshU7opkQNK5MBwaqfb8eal8kfZy3YsSqJ93Tn6OwBImDOz/gmXEKakB3LiUfI r24g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315A1MAbSs14kHZJDrkGMve31fZmDzFCUOp3MYgHkdsPXHI1rRQ r6DXI8pYeBKEg/Bz1OcBG6Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzondZ2Fr1IDbk1rclTZfI5kulmoCZ7vS+Z/X5MrLtC4IIs/5DFD7TnaBMwzKgs71VYe4iJhg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:de86:: with SMTP id j6mr11678743edv.1.1639925673880; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 06:54:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:ab88:368f:2080:eab:126a:947d:3008? ([2a02:ab88:368f:2080:eab:126a:947d:3008]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dm7sm1505647edb.7.2021.12.19.06.54.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 06:54:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 3/7] dt-bindings: arm: samsung: document jackpotlte board binding From: David Virag To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sam Protsenko , Chanwoo Choi , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Sylwester Nawrocki , Michael Turquette , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tomasz Figa , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:53:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <163958527260.183299.17749602272220762675.b4-ty@canonical.com> References: <20211206153124.427102-1-virag.david003@gmail.com> <20211206153124.427102-4-virag.david003@gmail.com> <163958527260.183299.17749602272220762675.b4-ty@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 17:21 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 16:31:17 +0100, David Virag wrote: > > Add binding for the jackpotlte board (Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)). > > > > > > Applied, thanks! > > [3/7] dt-bindings: arm: samsung: document jackpotlte board binding >       commit: c96ebc5fde274edcc02543dcfb6a1ee097f98070 > > Best regards, Hi Krzysztof! Thanks! As I'll be sending v5 of this series soon (only really adding r-by, acked-by tags and only real changes in dts/dtsi patch), should I omit this patch from it since it has been applied? Or should I really only send the dts/dtsi patch at this point? Sorry if this is obvious, I just haven't sent that many patches before to know this. Best regards, David