MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5CA1D89F-9DDB-4F91-8929-FE29BB79A653@vmware.com>
 <CAHk-=wh-ETqwd6EC2PR6JJzCFHVxJgdbUcMpW5MS7gCa76EDsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4D97206A-3B32-4818-9980-8F24BC57E289@vmware.com> <CAHk-=whxvVQReBqZeaV41=sAWfT4xTfn6sMSWDfkHKVS3zX85w@mail.gmail.com>
 <5A7D771C-FF95-465E-95F6-CD249FE28381@vmware.com> <CAHk-=wgMuSkumYxeaaxbKFoAbw_gjYo1eRXXSFcBHzNG2xauTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=whYT0Q1F=bxG0yi=LN5gXY64zBwefsbkLoRiP5p598d5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <fca16906-8e7d-5d04-6990-dfa8392bad8b@redhat.com> <Yb+gId/gXocrlJYD@casper.infradead.org>
 <CAHk-=wiAzmB-jiHvF+EZ1-b0X3ts4LAYHaVhzpzXEjmC0X95eg@mail.gmail.com> <Yb+oi8fg1dJe1uBm@casper.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <Yb+oi8fg1dJe1uBm@casper.infradead.org>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:53:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgLLRT_KeM5Se1AxGcf-g5MkCS-JmPy169Rpdeky_YkXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing via
 FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE (!hugetlb)
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 1:48 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, agreed, I was thinking that we could use "not mapped at all"
> as an optimisation to avoid doing rmap walks.  eg __unmap_and_move().

So the thing is, it's a very dodgy optimization for a rather simple
reason: what if somebody pages the page in?

So even "not mapped at all" is questionable.

You have to check that it's also not a swapcache page, and hold the
page lock for that check, at the very least.

And by then, you're really in a very unusual situation - and my gut
feel says not one worth optimizing for (because anon pages are
_usually_ mapped at least once).

But I dunno - it might depend on your load. Maybe you have some very
special load that happens to trigger this case a lot?

              Linus