Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC264C4332F for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 08:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232511AbhLTI7G (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 03:59:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37656 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234894AbhLTI7E (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 03:59:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13071C06173F for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:59:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id n16so6808725plc.2 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:59:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QfelA9A7zZgAox1W6OKv950nSvHitTlpVw0BCbEGLEM=; b=43k6fAkuD7Dvl5iue76l01jFgYVRycluHoFw31d1HGfzCsDA21ZNMYJYHx5XUm1c4B gPPu1ATOesfq6rAj3TeNZVlrOp1G2CyaWveR6W6+SJ6EhRazR64SfKlUyfZSkLZLfSWq dkFOK9pgfYkfIwac1vX55d6yOfMPVHeBUlBPU0CY3G7tMmP/EYIs8YyyjWMbAiujDeHu I28mNSoCrG0ovvC2dIBs384UrqejCBzqlzGBsd/j/o3lCIq6MTUYYQLdPVtDStjI45Da UXk//cT7dq9g3THM/KmmH78whaTA+RA9r+5jDwQHMllmYH/qGHWqewgINqB/gdlRqNUA dDDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QfelA9A7zZgAox1W6OKv950nSvHitTlpVw0BCbEGLEM=; b=TNx2LNGTfP07O+CEVYv/8v4BnwUbKuAzjjbyLlGwFK1xgUb0eqg+x+/IRHBKXDn+mI 4pzLc4pUvxI7hjOB0RvKKNCysbpjdmHPHA4Yyg1ERo9qspZ3MwCF5ZPN0ii8Ef2Qi6UW Nb9FJWkt9U4x/dmdhuWim/5qmefMbQSVI9SmglFGqvaHPWyLd58mSpVXluHtyipTW1my Pc/o6w4+oMU7pbT7kJdIMllZVf4ffq6AmpqESXI0/F6sPrAKsdys1Shibn8fiFKLjq5m qPoDmXs1Tl77BFMRCQdYj3aaCoL9/qb2rLQVUyr/A/p3Whvtjf4h7MCnlAI7n4CkPkev LHWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+bTcJ+yJXzKcRMD8HxzRx5JLsb47MuQv+TxDu/4R8u+AJZ78d FSQObMXIiE38KMxTLDk0HRLw0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqSueKRkKx43yFYffuag7dzSeO1wCiG354NO7osOrVuOG4bmokawfkadTNMKIqYNNNICZCAw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1189:: with SMTP id e9mr18928720pja.153.1639990743549; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:59:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([61.120.150.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m11sm18441647pfk.27.2021.12.20.00.58.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:59:03 -0800 (PST) From: Muchun Song To: willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, shakeelb@google.com, guro@fb.com, shy828301@gmail.com, alexs@kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, david@fromorbit.com, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna.schumaker@netapp.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, kari.argillander@gmail.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, fam.zheng@bytedance.com, smuchun@gmail.com, Muchun Song Subject: [PATCH v5 10/16] mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one only when needed Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 16:56:43 +0800 Message-Id: <20211220085649.8196-11-songmuchun@bytedance.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 (Apple Git-122) In-Reply-To: <20211220085649.8196-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com> References: <20211220085649.8196-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But the number of memory cgroup is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 containers have been deployed on this machine (I do not know why there are so many containers, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). And memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. This can waste a lot of memory. Now the infrastructure for dynamic list_lru_one allocation is ready, so remove statically allocated memory code to save memory. Signed-off-by: Muchun Song --- include/linux/list_lru.h | 7 +-- mm/list_lru.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++- 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h index ab912c49334f..c36db6dc2a65 100644 --- a/include/linux/list_lru.h +++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h @@ -32,14 +32,15 @@ struct list_lru_one { }; struct list_lru_per_memcg { + struct rcu_head rcu; /* array of per cgroup per node lists, indexed by node id */ - struct list_lru_one node[0]; + struct list_lru_one node[]; }; struct list_lru_memcg { struct rcu_head rcu; /* array of per cgroup lists, indexed by memcg_cache_id */ - struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru[]; + struct list_lru_per_memcg __rcu *mlru[]; }; struct list_lru_node { @@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ int __list_lru_init(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware, int memcg_list_lru_alloc(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct list_lru *lru, gfp_t gfp); int memcg_update_all_list_lrus(int num_memcgs); -void memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(int src_idx, struct mem_cgroup *dst_memcg); +void memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(struct mem_cgroup *src, struct mem_cgroup *dst); /** * list_lru_add: add an element to the lru list's tail diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c index bffa80527723..fc938d8ff48f 100644 --- a/mm/list_lru.c +++ b/mm/list_lru.c @@ -60,8 +60,12 @@ list_lru_from_memcg_idx(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int idx) * from relocation (see memcg_update_list_lru). */ mlrus = rcu_dereference_check(lru->mlrus, lockdep_is_held(&nlru->lock)); - if (mlrus && idx >= 0) - return &mlrus->mlru[idx]->node[nid]; + if (mlrus && idx >= 0) { + struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru; + + mlru = rcu_dereference_check(mlrus->mlru[idx], true); + return mlru ? &mlru->node[nid] : NULL; + } return &nlru->lru; } @@ -188,7 +192,7 @@ unsigned long list_lru_count_one(struct list_lru *lru, rcu_read_lock(); l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_cache_id(memcg)); - count = READ_ONCE(l->nr_items); + count = l ? READ_ONCE(l->nr_items) : 0; rcu_read_unlock(); if (unlikely(count < 0)) @@ -217,8 +221,11 @@ __list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int memcg_idx, struct list_head *item, *n; unsigned long isolated = 0; - l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_idx); restart: + l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_idx); + if (!l) + goto out; + list_for_each_safe(item, n, &l->list) { enum lru_status ret; @@ -262,6 +269,7 @@ __list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int memcg_idx, BUG(); } } +out: return isolated; } @@ -354,20 +362,25 @@ static struct list_lru_per_memcg *memcg_init_list_lru_one(gfp_t gfp) return mlru; } -static int memcg_init_list_lru_range(struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus, - int begin, int end) +static void memcg_list_lru_free(struct list_lru *lru, int src_idx) { - int i; + struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus; + struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru; - for (i = begin; i < end; i++) { - mlrus->mlru[i] = memcg_init_list_lru_one(GFP_KERNEL); - if (!mlrus->mlru[i]) - goto fail; - } - return 0; -fail: - memcg_destroy_list_lru_range(mlrus, begin, i); - return -ENOMEM; + spin_lock_irq(&lru->lock); + mlrus = rcu_dereference_protected(lru->mlrus, true); + mlru = rcu_dereference_protected(mlrus->mlru[src_idx], true); + rcu_assign_pointer(mlrus->mlru[src_idx], NULL); + spin_unlock_irq(&lru->lock); + + /* + * The __list_lru_walk_one() can walk the list of this node. + * We need kvfree_rcu() here. And the walking of the list + * is under lru->node[nid]->lock, which can serve as a RCU + * read-side critical section. + */ + if (mlru) + kvfree_rcu(mlru, rcu); } static int memcg_init_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware) @@ -381,14 +394,10 @@ static int memcg_init_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware) spin_lock_init(&lru->lock); - mlrus = kvmalloc(struct_size(mlrus, mlru, size), GFP_KERNEL); + mlrus = kvzalloc(struct_size(mlrus, mlru, size), GFP_KERNEL); if (!mlrus) return -ENOMEM; - if (memcg_init_list_lru_range(mlrus, 0, size)) { - kvfree(mlrus); - return -ENOMEM; - } RCU_INIT_POINTER(lru->mlrus, mlrus); return 0; @@ -422,13 +431,9 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, int old_size, int new_siz if (!new) return -ENOMEM; - if (memcg_init_list_lru_range(new, old_size, new_size)) { - kvfree(new); - return -ENOMEM; - } - spin_lock_irq(&lru->lock); memcpy(&new->mlru, &old->mlru, flex_array_size(new, mlru, old_size)); + memset(&new->mlru[old_size], 0, flex_array_size(new, mlru, new_size - old_size)); rcu_assign_pointer(lru->mlrus, new); spin_unlock_irq(&lru->lock); @@ -436,20 +441,6 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, int old_size, int new_siz return 0; } -static void memcg_cancel_update_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, - int old_size, int new_size) -{ - struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus; - - mlrus = rcu_dereference_protected(lru->mlrus, - lockdep_is_held(&list_lrus_mutex)); - /* - * Do not bother shrinking the array back to the old size, because we - * cannot handle allocation failures here. - */ - memcg_destroy_list_lru_range(mlrus, old_size, new_size); -} - int memcg_update_all_list_lrus(int new_size) { int ret = 0; @@ -460,15 +451,10 @@ int memcg_update_all_list_lrus(int new_size) list_for_each_entry(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) { ret = memcg_update_list_lru(lru, old_size, new_size); if (ret) - goto fail; + break; } -out: mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex); return ret; -fail: - list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) - memcg_cancel_update_list_lru(lru, old_size, new_size); - goto out; } static void memcg_drain_list_lru_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, @@ -485,6 +471,8 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, spin_lock_irq(&nlru->lock); src = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, src_idx); + if (!src) + goto out; dst = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, dst_idx); list_splice_init(&src->list, &dst->list); @@ -494,7 +482,7 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, set_shrinker_bit(dst_memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru)); src->nr_items = 0; } - +out: spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); } @@ -505,15 +493,41 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, for_each_node(i) memcg_drain_list_lru_node(lru, i, src_idx, dst_memcg); + + memcg_list_lru_free(lru, src_idx); } -void memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(int src_idx, struct mem_cgroup *dst_memcg) +void memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(struct mem_cgroup *src, struct mem_cgroup *dst) { + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; struct list_lru *lru; + int src_idx = src->kmemcg_id; + + /* + * Change kmemcg_id of this cgroup and all its descendants to the + * parent's id, and then move all entries from this cgroup's list_lrus + * to ones of the parent. + * + * After we have finished, all list_lrus corresponding to this cgroup + * are guaranteed to remain empty. So we can safely free this cgroup's + * list lrus in memcg_list_lru_free(). + * + * Changing ->kmemcg_id to the parent can prevent memcg_list_lru_alloc() + * from allocating list lrus for this cgroup after memcg_list_lru_free() + * call. + */ + rcu_read_lock(); + css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &src->css) { + struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + + memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); + memcg->kmemcg_id = dst->kmemcg_id; + } + rcu_read_unlock(); mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex); list_for_each_entry(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) - memcg_drain_list_lru(lru, src_idx, dst_memcg); + memcg_drain_list_lru(lru, src_idx, dst); mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex); } @@ -528,7 +542,7 @@ static bool memcg_list_lru_allocated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, return true; rcu_read_lock(); - allocated = !!rcu_dereference(lru->mlrus)->mlru[idx]; + allocated = !!rcu_access_pointer(rcu_dereference(lru->mlrus)->mlru[idx]); rcu_read_unlock(); return allocated; @@ -576,11 +590,12 @@ int memcg_list_lru_alloc(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct list_lru *lru, mlrus = rcu_dereference_protected(lru->mlrus, true); while (i--) { int index = table[i].memcg->kmemcg_id; + struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru = table[i].mlru; - if (mlrus->mlru[index]) - kfree(table[i].mlru); + if (index < 0 || rcu_dereference_protected(mlrus->mlru[index], true)) + kfree(mlru); else - mlrus->mlru[index] = table[i].mlru; + rcu_assign_pointer(mlrus->mlru[index], mlru); } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lru->lock, flags); diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index ec7a62f39326..94d8f742c32e 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -3643,6 +3643,10 @@ static void memcg_offline_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) memcg_reparent_objcgs(memcg, parent); + /* + * memcg_drain_all_list_lrus() can change memcg->kmemcg_id. + * Cache it to local @kmemcg_id. + */ kmemcg_id = memcg->kmemcg_id; /* @@ -3651,7 +3655,7 @@ static void memcg_offline_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) * The ordering is imposed by list_lru_node->lock taken by * memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(). */ - memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(kmemcg_id, parent); + memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(memcg, parent); memcg_free_cache_id(kmemcg_id); } -- 2.11.0