Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB49BC433F5 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239883AbhLTRC2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:02:28 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:29920 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239881AbhLTRC0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:02:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1640019745; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IMU+crRbPmjYFM4aE3gKGGI6VKsFtp6amlEI5UhnTVM=; b=DLEhdh9DaaBuyO2mgjD1NDDVdMhJDvt7EPDmZznwIYGcKD6jng4qhGI3J7lTkytF1RmjWY flIgfZSiveprPwLfsAy4LpQiZs1kv7kTWAN1eyKSqzFQhIbkzuMeEIWDD3ITRy6fD84PBW 5JAAv0PF1V6PlDfp3PUQZ7slPouIG9s= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-359-FIfPXNbAOa2f6u_dVsewhg-1; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:02:24 -0500 X-MC-Unique: FIfPXNbAOa2f6u_dVsewhg-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id v19-20020a056402349300b003f7eba50675so8103310edc.12 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:02:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IMU+crRbPmjYFM4aE3gKGGI6VKsFtp6amlEI5UhnTVM=; b=7qEDyXYQwXMS+LXvZrVhyqzjRHQV1CgW8GJllj9e3yImQDZ9ChRFVNuhtQLjHDQFS+ FKtinoVNXG9IcyHBjXJu5qo35iRwThGnBZDtnulqiq1qy8jfNctHEKs7J9zqtltQykMg 7fCV8BYXmYKQq2bv9OlQMgALtXMZhGZVkH+EplYk4tO26X7zUqbPzhKCTtcMVAxAsyeD CFMK73S1/iJJmklFTHK3Xt48YjPD+mu5N5bmKAo/yRWgLdiTqE3rVOodloKkOcAsLmwr UTNzdrX8b6zHBzW8gdOSxQ9bPm7YPH4+OP/O7l4QxAnjriqj/IxRPoHlZ/Bnt8fYC2UE j+FA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531X6kbwesDrDgSNQOwuBH5oSNDWZ7Xy28Ou8nIsSosMxnuwSH6z Gm6v+OV8iC0yn4UprtHeHNqwccecmSHWTSk379yIrS8YUu25z02qDMkH8fGjZY5P8aQtnTXpY8e lyIq1qRtPy9fsnpryR9Lvxvr2DJl0ZRqChAGNsS/X X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:d05:: with SMTP id eb5mr17171221edb.360.1640019743123; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:02:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3uewW7dW2JUgtnmE5hrswtZYTJhzi+M3Hljl0JXA6W2KOd/ltCxASxmEBtTAIgQ7/+1mGgrxoW1uwmM7YFrg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:d05:: with SMTP id eb5mr17171189edb.360.1640019742880; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:02:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211104171734.137707-1-wander@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Wander Costa Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:02:11 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: serial: Use fifo in 8250 console driver To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Wander Lairson Costa , Jiri Slaby , Andrew Jeffery , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Johan Hovold , Serge Semin , =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= , "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:45 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 02:17:31PM -0300, wander@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Wander Lairson Costa > > > > Note: I am using a small test app + driver located at [0] for the > > problem description. serco is a driver whose write function dispatches > > to the serial controller. sertest is a user-mode app that writes n bytes > > to the serial console using the serco driver. > > > > Recently I got a report of a soft lockup while loading a bunch a > > scsi_debug devices (> 500). > > > > While investigating it, I noticed that the serial console throughput > > (called by the printk code) is way below the configured speed of 115200 > > bps in a HP Proliant DL380 Gen9 server. I was expecting something above > > 10KB/s, but I got 2.5KB/s. I then built a simple driver [0] to isolate > > the console from the printk code. Here it is: > > > > $ time ./sertest -n 2500 /tmp/serco > > > > real 0m0.997s > > user 0m0.000s > > sys 0m0.997s > > > > With the help of the function tracer, I then noticed the serial > > controller was taking around 410us seconds to dispatch one single byte: > > > > $ trace-cmd record -p function_graph -g serial8250_console_write \ > > ./sertest -n 1 /tmp/serco > > > > $ trace-cmd report > > > > | serial8250_console_write() { > > 0.384 us | _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(); > > 1.836 us | io_serial_in(); > > 1.667 us | io_serial_out(); > > | uart_console_write() { > > | serial8250_console_putchar() { > > | wait_for_xmitr() { > > 1.870 us | io_serial_in(); > > 2.238 us | } > > 1.737 us | io_serial_out(); > > 4.318 us | } > > 4.675 us | } > > | wait_for_xmitr() { > > 1.635 us | io_serial_in(); > > | __const_udelay() { > > 1.125 us | delay_tsc(); > > 1.429 us | } > > ... > > ... > > ... > > 1.683 us | io_serial_in(); > > | __const_udelay() { > > 1.248 us | delay_tsc(); > > 1.486 us | } > > 1.671 us | io_serial_in(); > > 411.342 us | } > > > > In another machine, I measured a throughput of 11.5KB/s, with the serial > > controller taking between 80-90us to send each byte. That matches the > > expected throughput for a configuration of 115200 bps. > > > > This patch changes the serial8250_console_write to use the 16550 fifo > > if available. In my artificial benchmark I could get a throughput > > increase up to 100% in some cases, but in the real case described at the > > beginning the gain was of about 25%. > > > > [0] https://github.com/walac/serial-console-test > > > > Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa > > --- > > drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h | 3 ++ > > drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h > > index 6473361525d1..c711bf118cc1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h > > @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ struct serial8250_config { > > #define UART_CAP_MINI BIT(17) /* Mini UART on BCM283X family lacks: > > * STOP PARITY EPAR SPAR WLEN5 WLEN6 > > */ > > +#define UART_CAP_CWFIFO BIT(18) /* Use the UART Fifo in > > + * serial8250_console_write > > + */ > > Why do you need a new bit? Why can't you just do this change for all > devices that have a fifo? Why would you _not_ want to do this for all > devices that have a fifo? > The v1 patch [1] didn't have this extra bit. Andy suggested [2] to add it so we only enabled this new code on tested controllers as a precaution. If it doesn't make sense to you, feel free to consider the v1 patch [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029201402.428284-1-wander@redhat.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHp75Vf6DjNcPWpE4Dh3SuzUMJbFQjq1UNCkrCa60uw35SpqKg@mail.gmail.com/ > thanks, > > greg k-h >