Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772B0C433F5 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240138AbhLTRRn (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:17:43 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59922 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240110AbhLTRRm (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:17:42 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853F2D6E; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:17:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.57]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47F3B3F774; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:17:41 -0800 (PST) From: Valentin Schneider To: Vincent Donnefort , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, qperret@google.com, Vincent Donnefort Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: Do not raise overutilized for idle CPUs In-Reply-To: <20211220114323.22811-4-vincent.donnefort@arm.com> References: <20211220114323.22811-1-vincent.donnefort@arm.com> <20211220114323.22811-4-vincent.donnefort@arm.com> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:17:38 +0000 Message-ID: <8735mn8abx.mognet@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20/12/21 12:43, Vincent Donnefort wrote: > During a migration, the lock for the previous runqueue is not taken and > hence, the task contribution isn't directly removed from that runqueue > utilization but instead temporarily saved, until the next PELT signals > update where it would be accounted. There is then a window in which a > CPU can ben idle be nonetheless overutilized. > > The load balancer wouldn't be able to do anything to help a sleeping CPU, > it brings then no gain to raise overutilized there, only the risk of > spuriously doing it. > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort > Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 51f6f55abb37..37f737c5f0b8 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -8641,26 +8641,28 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, > > nr_running = rq->nr_running; > sgs->sum_nr_running += nr_running; > - > - if (nr_running > 1) > - *sg_status |= SG_OVERLOAD; > - > - if (cpu_overutilized(i)) > - *sg_status |= SG_OVERUTILIZED; > - > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING > sgs->nr_numa_running += rq->nr_numa_running; > sgs->nr_preferred_running += rq->nr_preferred_running; > #endif > + if (nr_running > 1) > + *sg_status |= SG_OVERLOAD; > + > /* > * No need to call idle_cpu() if nr_running is not 0 > */ > if (!nr_running && idle_cpu(i)) { > sgs->idle_cpus++; > - /* Idle cpu can't have misfit task */ > + /* > + * Idle cpu can neither be overutilized nor have a > + * misfit task. > + */ > continue; > } > > + if (cpu_overutilized(i)) > + *sg_status |= SG_OVERUTILIZED; > + > if (local_group) > continue; > > -- > 2.25.1