Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:55:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:54:52 -0500 Received: from cogito.cam.org ([198.168.100.2]:32273 "EHLO cogito.cam.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:54:42 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Ed Tomlinson Organization: me To: Andreas Dilger , Nikita Danilov Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [REISERFS TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre7 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:58:28 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= , ReiserFS List , Linux Kernel List In-Reply-To: <200111210110.fAL1Atc11275@beta.namesys.com> <15355.27299.252362.983624@beta.reiserfs.com> <20011121011655.M1308@lynx.no> In-Reply-To: <20011121011655.M1308@lynx.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20011121125829.345E89C77@oscar.casa.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On November 21, 2001 03:16 am, Andreas Dilger wrote: > In any case, it is also a bad thing to leave garbage in unused parts of > on-disk data structs for just this reason, so mkreiserfs should zero > everything that is unused inside allocated structs (and the kernel too, > because reiserfs allocates inode tables dynamically, right?). Also reiserfsck? It would be nice if it cleaned too... Ed Tomlinson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/