Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BB6C433EF for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233084AbhLTXhM (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:37:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41966 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229690AbhLTXhK (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:37:10 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78FB9C061574; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:37:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id b186-20020a1c1bc3000000b00345734afe78so987125wmb.0; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:37:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hraqWg5PWkO6+tfHwaIKUlh6JY2C21320PM73mzNHOw=; b=k6LLolZNh4iIZvLxOIVtmw8feJjFRGfDrb9lzRw91dR0j2XCGLcs1+L0pCRbMJgPKl tF1sxgKZ7GI/cMfh1SPnwkyIY/23Zxo3kRTI0BHNzKGkb/+QxaiMJiJ7tiq5P2AgZM5H FB6ffWA4uz3Cm+iWQ1/VXFsOdmJgQY66vrym5FXRZU9oGoAJ86tT5WSpCCC4iJWmWgQL Kh9HF9x21bVuVvJzACBlI9FcOz+X2v6pyt2xbeEBeBPuDpKiXlHpudKIxpo+bNe5Swae wvaoMsJef3YYB9r3HGbTad1IQslejm9A7TwccvjjiHHephpG3ND+z14Oc3Uj0/6BSGnW Xeeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hraqWg5PWkO6+tfHwaIKUlh6JY2C21320PM73mzNHOw=; b=dBeAtxrxOFjRunp+OIBtHm0fZzJI5+D965MbSAu33RWe+/M4RmXMjofjvcD3wsOY7Q BrnS34nV5Mx+/K1NHvYQNIo2npOVAibAoRo44xUtQOSWhua8pRCDwcWBHBAtS4e1MkZi Px2bqDpKysf9yiQeoNrDwAlGU10yVq942GtA98lTEmjr2iPv4TNpvqedMyiT8OZDoZX8 RQ5MYsnhmtzcCvw1D5vPERHxckwOfuCWXZ4rgB/OPB94E2DV4et585/pN6Z32WQCzOmY hX7zhv9djbaI9APlggl1SxRgzMiPKs9AsgtgZ0pevsoTgcOcyYhtyUW0/mGoL2TPhlDO u+xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530d+pNM6+n9A2E+YnxHPHNvhn04WVInW99o0goFmhRDDh3N2aeh HUKn2evkVnj9HiuFKJ3hLrq173KezvI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxB9JMVl+Pf+9miHkpICnK+MG3yoLRcCBMr54xK5niUXcY2Joit4s6upOB5Dtf8p+MjtOmyEg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb90:: with SMTP id m16mr222122wmi.183.1640043429154; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:37:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.16] (cpc141996-chfd3-2-0-cust928.12-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.13.91.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p21sm706314wmq.20.2021.12.20.15.37.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:37:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: fix wrong node passed to find nargs_prop To: Andy Shevchenko , =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgTMOpZ2Vy?= , Sakari Ailus Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Heikki Krogerus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20211220210533.3578678-1-clement.leger@bootlin.com> From: Daniel Scally Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:37:07 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks Andy On 20/12/2021 22:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > + Sakari, Dan > > On Monday, December 20, 2021, Clément Léger > wrote: > > nargs_prop refers to a property located in the reference that is found > within the nargs property. I think this is right (it's not used in the ACPI version, and the OF version is quite convoluted so a bit hard to follow)...but also I note that none of the users of fwnode_property_get_reference_args() pass anything to nargs_prop anyway...do we even need this? Use the correct reference node in call to > property_entry_read_int_array() to retrieve the correct nargs value. > > Fixes: b06184acf751 ("software node: Add > software_node_get_reference_args()") I think this might have been introduced later...maybe 996b0830f95d1, maybe e933bedd45099 > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger > > --- >  drivers/base/swnode.c | 2 +- >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c > index 4debcea4fb12..0a482212c7e8 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c > +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct > fwnode_handle *fwnode, >                 return -ENOENT; > >         if (nargs_prop) { > -               error = > property_entry_read_int_array(swnode->node->properties, > +               error = > property_entry_read_int_array(ref->node->properties, >                                                       nargs_prop, > sizeof(u32), >                                                       > &nargs_prop_val, 1); >                 if (error) > -- > 2.34.1 > > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >