Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161049AbXAZRWz (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:22:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161050AbXAZRWy (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:22:54 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:39108 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161049AbXAZRWx (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:22:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:22:48 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Mel Gorman cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] Allow huge page allocations to use GFP_HIGH_MOVABLE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070125234458.28809.5412.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20070125234558.28809.21103.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 575 Lines: 14 On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > > What is the e1000 problem? Jumbo packet allocation via GFP_KERNEL? > Yes. Potentially the anti-fragmentation patches could address this by > clustering atomic allocations together as much as possible. GFP_ATOMIC allocs? Do you have a reference to the thread where this was discussed? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/