Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7961EC433EF for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234643AbhLUHJi (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:09:38 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]:40378 "EHLO dfw.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233417AbhLUHJh (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:09:37 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B420661463; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D526C36AE9; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:09:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1640070576; bh=Pvvhgzw4Bg7THafEjDQkprLbY/TI8E6lWZ5l34UMp2M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=J5nPdGiF6OxtfnvPVTtM24vPraqu6b2zOscCic9VIKoXeAHp1TVKWlaMayXLRJ1On k+iUNWxZjblS2RGy+JqVV3oqDTJgjwCkc7Ptt+ufVRGxqoxcIOkA6RMqbyONTvBB9d 7DYiLxuRKGrwu3+2WhnMQfXtEMatOGMlOfiGYxrc= Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:09:33 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Mike Ximing Chen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, dan.j.williams@intel.com, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 00/17] dlb: introduce DLB device driver Message-ID: References: <20211221065047.290182-1-mike.ximing.chen@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211221065047.290182-1-mike.ximing.chen@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:50:30AM -0600, Mike Ximing Chen wrote: > v12: How is a "RFC" series on version 12? "RFC" means "I do not think this should be merged, please give me some comments on how this is all structured" which I think is not the case here. > - The following coding style changes suggested by Dan will be implemented > in the next revision > -- Replace DLB_CSR_RD() and DLB_CSR_WR() with direct ioread32() and > iowrite32() call. > -- Remove bitmap wrappers and use linux bitmap functions directly. > -- Use trace_event in configfs attribute file update. Why submit a patch series that you know will be changed? Just do the work, don't ask anyone to review stuff you know is incorrect, that just wastes our time and ensures that we never want to review it again. greg k-h