Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CEDC433EF for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237042AbhLULUn (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 06:20:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58542 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231248AbhLULUn (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 06:20:43 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD488C061574; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 03:20:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id a203-20020a1c7fd4000000b003457874263aso1438417wmd.2; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 03:20:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=A5VmHeK4a1YbrsJfhZ9m+7CzigXVHiNjupNeCq7BdgA=; b=adKXF+uU9R2/GLmLmvrIRm6GfGmjGGpbIboCM1X2LGnprMQIROvAygtZO3H3CTvEh3 w4m21LIDQG0LoUNmNp8WJ4g9B3hNsaN8Ry6mTwhVAwXsWJaasnJE0pZDG5U25B2i1BkN isecd5PxUOUvdhYtrVM7j/2hxjoAH14LkiiJxd7e06XXXrpTNYh1RfXGioJJhsXlkbNa GsC5DAzMwni5MaRoNbYsjzvUroTGC0gDKypGmDBT4rStU4ZjNJ8DsL6xJDhrcoZTVpX3 v7hKDsjjCbo8oWbPsaHwWUNGRo9E0/UGPpDrok7zdd2xa8LRs0/XKUUYzLTjogUJwm2+ 2AcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=A5VmHeK4a1YbrsJfhZ9m+7CzigXVHiNjupNeCq7BdgA=; b=F4U6Ugs9uODojyQkfgZIcgjcjySGN3B3wEq9zThVp65xJGnedrU8FttKp7Auatlcbw ATlWXVCCx/AVKp5xEeTvZc/KjMWEWKPGYdgrkiSXAFEtMna7Ly39zPfvWT65ypxv8m7e 4/FQ82tP4t/LL4VI+sDxa/HdWPioJEAgCMh40QAbjVQV53eGWG58cwmOjGqrYy4kxf1z q2zXJX1QPDrWn7fmfPymSgis68xgKmcPPygzk/qWfPQf+EnGyF98lGLtPEZfZ6YXzLvd 15tg1yfsCOoOhom9LZ6zrO65c2e7frcpmu3fm8E7EA2xsLzS3Fd5Skfu48SSLWYH89xN RWtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530yEc2gbOofnf2pk0+lg12NRGFAxRDQT2mNXge0/+jUbheAT/Cg 0MJd3G2+yIrzqrrFdcqHEg8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwr9w2UUZrBvUeIB+mRDvojgbMcazHUP8KlAU7k8Q0CvZ/p8j+dR78N4jywxn0tn3xPNBOqUg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3c8a:: with SMTP id bg10mr2358826wmb.106.1640085641346; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 03:20:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-99-153-109.as13285.net. [2.99.153.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b197sm2086906wmb.24.2021.12.21.03.20.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 03:20:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:20:39 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/71] 5.4.168-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20211220143025.683747691@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211220143025.683747691@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:33:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.168 release. > There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:30:09 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/534 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip