Date:   Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:40:00 -0300
From:   Gaston Gonzalez <gascoar@gmail.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, nsaenz@kernel.org,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, rjui@broadcom.com, sbranden@broadcom.com,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
        juerg.haefliger@canonical.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
        dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com, stefan.wahren@i2se.com,
        unixbhaskar@gmail.com, mitaliborkar810@gmail.com,
        phil@raspberrypi.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        gascoar@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: vc04_services: avoid the use of typedef for
 function pointers
Message-ID: <YcI7oGVjwQA4+5uc@debianG>
References: <cover.1639858361.git.gascoar@gmail.com>
 <YcFyNFR66Ii2tos+@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YcFyNFR66Ii2tos+@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:20:36AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 06:29:10PM -0300, Gaston Gonzalez wrote:
> > This patch set removes some typedefs for function pointers in vc04_services.
> > 
> > After patches 01 to 03, there are no remaining typedef under vc04_services.
> > Hence, the patch 04/04 updates the TODO file removing the 'remove typedefs'
> > task.
> > 
> > Gaston Gonzalez (4):
> >   staging: bcm2835-audio: replace function typedefs with equivalent
> >     declaration
> >   staging: vc04_services: replace function typedef with equivalent
> >     declaration
> >   staging: vc04_services: avoid the use of typedef for function pointers
> >   staging: vc04_services: update TODO file
> 
> These are not the name of the patches that you sent out at all :(
> 
> Are you sure you created this properly?
> 
> Something went wrong.
> 
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

I'm sorry, I messed up editing the subjects using git send-email
directly. I didn't realized that that would create a mismatch with the
summary in patch 0/4. It is clear now ...

thanks,

Gaston