Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85846C433EF for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 03:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242299AbhLVDrO (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:47:14 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58250 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242233AbhLVDrH (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:47:07 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8FD8C061747; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:47:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com with SMTP id o10so1191128qvc.5; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:47:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EgxBJt4KJLwPCnRlFoogBKl1bDW0aQ7la8JVMlwDvkQ=; b=BJjb0KftF5Av3FGcq0xlbS4fS4JVaETnGFPkCt59NEH7FEVv4CeW07jNlhhSOQ1sh4 R4cbIZUb0hoxzNX8Zrk5/xIt298yq8uugef5AfEU3cdgIFvs+938VMFljcAsHYj44tLd feJp+XUE+1fMn1E95QL2H1bE0JMJB7nXgAKgiaD1aIofWfAGoEMlip/hPlpbVa5MgGCG cO0OXgKmAjCcg1yB9aG7ndFEhFLaod4hSktRYU74Lb+A/RsM85QeZQem5Pk4stmHeU4M qvK2qdteaL4G/U67mAZTu4Cd2O4InkVUxIgQa7Xq7soUmtICUX6tJCtA+2B4orjNZpoO zc2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EgxBJt4KJLwPCnRlFoogBKl1bDW0aQ7la8JVMlwDvkQ=; b=eC43cbDJDG/9JLSZN8pByEKZ0Kjmwddo0NEe03o4wn7yGx4woIb4omRIUQuBr9nkcw QMijxCgXGwXaNrY9CXgxflFRhPP21Nd2tL0E++ZDcE0SjJYlU7NA21v3YoThGiyjfWxG s7rfuUq6odGQ+rGp4e7x1mOY8rT26KNpkKp1VCzABZgrCgiKL1JIc/9GZxDhki1er82Z yln7H6OF4dtHmMs1T+2ExavkqOTrI8sU+IhoOFSjsROWV97n8HQA4W9wLFNOZKreGYjM J1uY1p1Ft6/kmA7l5N76dp6o4iEvyAlHgwWB/heAp7SJUI1N5Syo5dXAl63pz2EUZmlQ ClAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323wTY+xvjZdrvoizBmd4/kWimvbRCPnlmPYxTKNN6A43VtwwYG wQKXa7j+YRMV1JjYCrW597nWm6oU5DmJeg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyUbWbKGjAvS2c+7+yZt3kdHDdAxfjLac3bLpyUgFaWxdb8uK11uhmHUVQC5oeW/L2pTJwC2A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5096:: with SMTP id kk22mr1076664qvb.117.1640144826109; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:47:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from shaak.xiphos.ca (69-165-204-82.cable.teksavvy.com. [69.165.204.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f18sm918944qko.34.2021.12.21.19.47.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:47:05 -0800 (PST) From: Liam Beguin To: liambeguin@gmail.com, peda@axentia.se, jic23@kernel.org, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, lars@metafoo.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v11 09/15] iio: afe: rescale: reduce risk of integer overflow Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:46:40 -0500 Message-Id: <20211222034646.222189-10-liambeguin@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.0 In-Reply-To: <20211222034646.222189-1-liambeguin@gmail.com> References: <20211222034646.222189-1-liambeguin@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Liam Beguin Reduce the risk of integer overflow by doing the scale calculation on a 64-bit integer. Since the rescaling is only performed on *val, reuse the IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2 case. Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin --- drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c index ca8fd69bfe46..0000a58bab9d 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c +++ b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c @@ -23,21 +23,31 @@ int rescale_process_scale(struct rescale *rescale, int scale_type, int *val, int *val2) { s64 tmp; + int _val, _val2; s32 rem, rem2; u32 mult; u32 neg; switch (scale_type) { - case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL: - *val *= rescale->numerator; - *val2 *= rescale->denominator; - return scale_type; case IIO_VAL_INT: *val *= rescale->numerator; if (rescale->denominator == 1) return scale_type; *val2 = rescale->denominator; return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL; + case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL: + /* + * When the product of both scales doesn't overflow, avoid + * potential accuracy loss (for in kernel consumers) by + * keeping a fractional representation. + */ + if (!check_mul_overflow(*val, rescale->numerator, &_val) && + !check_mul_overflow(*val2, rescale->denominator, &_val2)) { + *val = _val; + *val2 = _val2; + return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL; + } + fallthrough; case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2: tmp = (s64)*val * 1000000000LL; tmp = div_s64(tmp, rescale->denominator); @@ -49,7 +59,10 @@ int rescale_process_scale(struct rescale *rescale, int scale_type, if (!rem) return scale_type; - tmp = 1 << *val2; + if (scale_type == IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL) + tmp = *val2; + else + tmp = 1 << *val2; rem2 = *val % (int)tmp; *val = *val / (int)tmp; -- 2.34.0