Date:   Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:41:33 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com>
Cc:     realwakka@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex definition
Message-ID: <YcLyzSI6qeLhypzG@kroah.com>
References: <20211222093626.GA13332@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211222093626.GA13332@localhost.localdomain>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:36:26PM +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> Checkpatch reports: CHECK: struct mutex definition without comment.
> Fix this by documenting what rx_mutex struct is used for in pi433 driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> index 29bd37669059..aa0ecb3788c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct pi433_device {
>  	u32			rx_bytes_to_drop;
>  	u32			rx_bytes_dropped;
>  	unsigned int		rx_position;
> +	/* rx read and config operations can only be served one at the time */

What exactly does this mean?  What is this protecting?  This comment
doesn't seem to be explaining much :(

thanks,

greg k-h