Date:   Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:23:34 +0000
From:   David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_Question_about_node_naming_in_=5BPATCH_v3?= =?US-ASCII?Q?_13/18=5D_ARM=3A_dts=3A_qcom=3A_sdx55=3A_Add_spmi_node?=
In-Reply-To: <20211222091910.GA5159@thinkpad>
References: <HTKF4R.5S1PY4MCM4QS@ixit.cz> <20211221071219.GD26872@thinkpad> <20211222091910.GA5159@thinkpad>
Message-ID: <8AFA24D7-3378-42B6-87E2-0C4FB2ACDF95@ixit.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Thank you=2E

I'll rename the nodes to `spmi@` then and send binding conversion=2E

David


PR is merged now=2E So you can proceed with using "spmi" node name in all =
dts=2E

Thanks,
Mani

> Thanks,
> Mani
>=20
> [1] https://github=2Ecom/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/pull/50
>=20
> > I'm currently converting binding for
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb and I'm
> > considering adding qcom,spmi into qcom,spmi-pmic-arb or just rename th=
is and
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996=2Edtsi `qcom,spmi@` occurences to `sp=
mi@`=2E
> >=20
> > Ideas, inputs?
> >=20
> > Thank you
> > David
> >=20
> >=20