Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2284FC433EF for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245257AbhLVNJw (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:09:52 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:54867 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240747AbhLVNJt (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:09:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1640178588; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CfGQJ8VLCAkR3VAHE3KwEWNYdOWUKHoL0zlrbiTMV8w=; b=M8yH0ynkgK98ZCITtHNEfczeLW+b9oJTWexk6bmYdOKkEpHYCZfu7Vp8TJ+/ONOTGzheIu mgPGS+QcS8GSxrN3n4b41ea0Nj1oURlNga65fp45pL3o4ZQX0RrR2cM60sNTnarLl326F8 lhARJHvcFh3dg9N1qvff+9NAGa36/i0= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-325-b6RViJaUOX6lFPdFrWD6vw-1; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:09:45 -0500 X-MC-Unique: b6RViJaUOX6lFPdFrWD6vw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id r8-20020a05600c35c800b00345bfa31160so734297wmq.0 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:09:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CfGQJ8VLCAkR3VAHE3KwEWNYdOWUKHoL0zlrbiTMV8w=; b=2zyZd69j4CXJdK2LlHZ+N/eh0APSsS/gzk+JRv0+zAg8V2Yg8tZh1XT5Km3k15kVC/ nDvMbUyOiVj6X8TNh/XYGd8vPoLC9iTAC9TAra6cNpF/1WnkFxu2J2o+7JJmI6/30wIz QkhmlPCjw4CeDzEEmXydyT61qM87xe550k5FXRjsbdYgLTjgx+CmtL0mcN4Pq39UV9oz iNK1vfPRQylPwsiVuuRwpLmeblr7JB1qN613KJq3AuGHSRLq7+qj1u9mkHgGr2GboX17 wE9vQjQWxHbAbaCkDQXfwGwyB8rZzYbg9OgYoZ6xq8b4vdUPuRkrzsOZ9L6bebicYkb/ wHow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xfXPiUKX7wGcJ5JPLEr+h9l7K3RoXpRz1oiNBLD6JdjHL3ex7 /1Nqio8SAqNuAYdYdTyXxvxntMcHZrqwVKVkzebtTbEeE5kXQUTfZtKm4G4j2Pzt+d0tkcA/z7m izpotuV5P8hhdlnTwsIcxKddK X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2606:: with SMTP id m6mr952087wmm.52.1640178584280; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:09:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVw0VkRoILxmXz6ntlhHpAsfmiaJOO/xnfDe7yGOHGMLtP0t1L14n//3hYvbXuKWfqxczqDw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2606:: with SMTP id m6mr952048wmm.52.1640178583964; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:09:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.3.132] (p5b0c646a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.12.100.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bg12sm2178645wmb.5.2021.12.22.05.09.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 05:09:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4a28e8a0-2efa-8b5e-10b5-38f1fc143a98@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:09:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing via FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE (!hugetlb) Content-Language: en-US To: Jan Kara Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Linus Torvalds , Nadav Amit , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , John Hubbard , Mike Kravetz , Mike Rapoport , Yang Shi , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Vlastimil Babka , Jann Horn , Michal Hocko , Rik van Riel , Roman Gushchin , Andrea Arcangeli , Peter Xu , Donald Dutile , Christoph Hellwig , Oleg Nesterov , Linux-MM , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" References: <20211221010312.GC1432915@nvidia.com> <900b7d4a-a5dc-5c7b-a374-c4a8cc149232@redhat.com> <20211221190706.GG1432915@nvidia.com> <3e0868e6-c714-1bf8-163f-389989bf5189@redhat.com> <20211222124141.GA685@quack2.suse.cz> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20211222124141.GA685@quack2.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> IIUC, our COW logic makes sure that a shared anonymous page that might >> still be used by a R/O FOLL_GET cannot be modified, because any attempt >> to modify it would result in a copy. > > Well, we defined FOLL_PIN to mean the intent that the caller wants to access > not only page state (for which is enough FOLL_GET and there are some users > - mostly inside mm - who need this) but also page data. Eventually, we even > wanted to make FOLL_GET unavailable to broad areas of kernel (and keep it > internal to only MM for its dirty deeds ;)) to reduce the misuse of GUP. > > For file pages we need this data vs no-data access distinction so that > filesystems can detect when someone can be accessing page data although the > page is unmapped. Practically, filesystems care most about when someone > can be *modifying* page data (we need to make sure data is stable e.g. when > writing back data to disk or doing data checksumming or other operations) > so using FOLL_GET when wanting to only read page data should be OK for > filesystems but honestly I would be reluctant to break the rule of "use > FOLL_PIN when wanting to access page data" to keep things simple and > reasonably easy to understand for parties such as filesystem developers or > driver developers who all need to interact with pinned pages... Right, from an API perspective we really want people to use FOLL_PIN. To optimize this case in particular it would help if we would have the FOLL flags on the unpin path. Then we could just decide internally "well, short-term R/O FOLL_PIN can be really lightweight, we can treat this like a FOLL_GET instead". And we would need that as well if we were to keep different counters for R/O vs. R/W pinned. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb