Date:   Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:13:50 -0800
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
        Hemantg <hemantg@codeaurora.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rocky Liao <rjliao@codeaurora.org>, hbandi@codeaurora.org,
        Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>,
        mcchou@chromium.org, saluvala@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add bluetooth node on
 SC7280 IDP boards
Message-ID: <YcNOvlVQaT80qPsx@google.com>
References: <1639587963-22503-1-git-send-email-bgodavar@codeaurora.org>
 <580E8974-EB7F-4493-BECC-4B09765A954D@holtmann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <580E8974-EB7F-4493-BECC-4B09765A954D@holtmann.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 08:54:56AM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Balakrishna,
> 
> > Add bluetooth SoC WCN6750 node for SC7280 IDP boards.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > v4:
> >  * updated commit subject
> >  * Removed drive strength for bt_en
> >  * updated swctrl_gpio name to sw_ctrl
> > 
> > v3:
> >  * Addressed reviewers comments
> >  * Added pin config for sw_ctrl line.
> > v2:
> >  * merged two patches into one
> >  * Removed unused comments
> >  * Removed pinmux & pin conf.
> >  * Addressed reviewers comments
> > 
> > v1: initial patch
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts  |  4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp2.dts |  4 ++++
> > 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> 
> patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Thanks!

I would have expected though that a device tree change goes through
the qcom tree. Maybe Bjorn should pick it too to avoid possible
conflicts?