Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751843AbXA0PDa (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:03:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751845AbXA0PDa (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:03:30 -0500 Received: from 85.8.24.16.se.wasadata.net ([85.8.24.16]:41177 "EHLO smtp.drzeus.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751843AbXA0PDa (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:03:30 -0500 Message-ID: <45BB69BE.5060403@drzeus.cx> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:03:26 +0100 From: Pierre Ossman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061223) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Engelhardt CC: vandrove@vc.cvut.cz, LKML Subject: Re: ncpfs and TCP vs UDP References: <45BA2437.4000803@drzeus.cx> <1169846450.45ba70b2698c2@imap.vc.cvut.cz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 799 Lines: 24 Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Well, probably the same reason as NFS over UDP is discouraged. See nfs(5) > section WARNINGS (in short: IP fragment ID can wrap quite fast on Gigabit) > > I have no such warning in my nfs(5), but I am aware of this yes. Somewhat amusing that both nfs and ncpfs tend to default to using udp with this in mind. ;) Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/