Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751648AbXA0QI3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:08:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751747AbXA0QI3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:08:29 -0500 Received: from tmailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.23]:35537 "EHLO tmailer.gwdg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751634AbXA0QI2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:08:28 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:06:57 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Pierre Ossman cc: vandrove@vc.cvut.cz, LKML Subject: Re: ncpfs and TCP vs UDP In-Reply-To: <45BB69BE.5060403@drzeus.cx> Message-ID: References: <45BA2437.4000803@drzeus.cx> <1169846450.45ba70b2698c2@imap.vc.cvut.cz> <45BB69BE.5060403@drzeus.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 653 Lines: 18 >> Well, probably the same reason as NFS over UDP is discouraged. See nfs(5) >> section WARNINGS (in short: IP fragment ID can wrap quite fast on Gigabit) > >I have no such warning in my nfs(5), but I am aware of this yes. >Somewhat amusing that both nfs and ncpfs tend to default to using udp >with this in mind. ;) nfs has already been "fixed" to prefer tcp over udp (i.e. the default is tcp) -`J' -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/