Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5456FC433FE for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243352AbhLWLwc (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 06:52:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38938 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233724AbhLWLwa (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 06:52:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60557C061401 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 03:52:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id g132so3467236wmg.2 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 03:52:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=colorfullife-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vz4h/RJ8rZ3VS60YQh1WzGOuxDSr5YtX1Zwui52SKVc=; b=SQOpFeLuoIK3AUyO8KTyYlw5E20xMmt6Y85TplQ3xxU4QTHzjk26xwSIFYRtKEdG+J mP4s7UlLqs1+r5kLlZFQbF0R/Gb/cjcy8A8xJpWn6BggMskkHY0ieIIBIvMJW2XBMxj/ wc2pOSlw/ItFJRt4xfC9M/5zEvwZXQfy4D0YQz6oIwplLnn4PbDwQSIH1/9ueRehVcpz mXVL2Kv7pjM6TTEg5ng8zONcg/VDur0BL1Wmavj7WpeIYOFCd4Ax4Y3EmJERfrV49TvK G6+RP2c/u9fl7PDQsrnoxE2Dt3+/u7Yy0FT/q1sIg5+W+liYVJaTedRZWciOBw1OmKTB 0Zug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vz4h/RJ8rZ3VS60YQh1WzGOuxDSr5YtX1Zwui52SKVc=; b=o7XiMTqakIkRfhobUwwpYJfCvQ/OZcN9hhGyJvPV92ITIfDQcpAxu9PqXgi91k+lZE kQi3R8QF5srqGohNoTkHf3VJjpAsDMJtlK/QTaSIPHifGenYImakzMQguMFO5dfu85ZD WEKviHgp7weEDqDiKkxIu7/pC1LWmyGN7jQ5DaJdbo9/CJZit+MFzNqckvoPxrlX+Bsh 4j8vcgzNV1wTXzH7xUlhQCG6Di8fPMioqkQs3+bAj8BjNfyaaDci5DWEuAz+/H4oqX2G UFHBJozQK7YD/YGi6eCrLUJrJlJh73KFmkhZhd6TfgwoUbx6fS01fHtBkYW720p4eW0T lVhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vIr5TSPe4MjCsRN/XVU7LBbd44weDsi93RWhcmHUgSjbp3JYJ BjbMemw5YvP02fia6n6ek2KmOA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxr2eV0xUcmK0kd5NhXFsKWLzuRNo0SVcNrD/CNu9SSi5hSue+5jMAuBJrcIgxQQ3TVVNPbwQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c908:: with SMTP id f8mr1440221wmb.193.1640260348998; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 03:52:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:d9:970a:ab00:ae94:992d:1079:bfc? (p200300d9970aab00ae94992d10790bfc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:d9:970a:ab00:ae94:992d:1079:bfc]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i1sm7601297wml.26.2021.12.23.03.52.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 03:52:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <937f1320-6b7e-9aa2-2a21-7fd2f94eeb32@colorfullife.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:52:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/util.c: Make kvfree() safe for calling while holding spinlocks Content-Language: en-US To: Vasily Averin , LKML , Andrew Morton Cc: cgel.zte@gmail.com, shakeelb@google.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, dbueso@suse.de, unixbhaskar@gmail.com, chi.minghao@zte.com.cn, arnd@arndb.de, Zeal Robot , linux-mm@kvack.org, 1vier1@web.de, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20211222194828.15320-1-manfred@colorfullife.com> <3ca4dec8-f0bd-740f-73c8-34fc6fc1cf66@virtuozzo.com> From: Manfred Spraul In-Reply-To: <3ca4dec8-f0bd-740f-73c8-34fc6fc1cf66@virtuozzo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Vasily, On 12/23/21 08:21, Vasily Averin wrote: > > I would prefer to release memory ASAP if it's possible. > What do you think about this change? > --- a/mm/util.c > +++ b/mm/util.c > @@ -614,9 +614,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmalloc_node); > */ > void kvfree(const void *addr) > { > - if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr)) > - vfree(addr); > - else > + if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr)) { > + if (in_atomic()) > + vfree_atomic(); > + else > + vfree(addr); > + } else > kfree(addr); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvfree); > Unfortunately this cannot work: > /* > * Are we running in atomic context?  WARNING: this macro cannot > * always detect atomic context; in particular, it cannot know about > * held spinlocks in non-preemptible kernels.  Thus it should not be > * used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible. > * Do not use in_atomic() in driver code. > */ > #define in_atomic()     (preempt_count() != 0) > --     Manfred