Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752367AbXA0Tjf (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:39:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752366AbXA0Tjf (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:39:35 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:16106 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751962AbXA0Tjf (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:39:35 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,246,1167638400"; d="scan'208"; a="173733170:sNHT19011279" Message-ID: <45BBAA74.8090809@intel.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:39:32 -0800 From: Auke Kok User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: Auke Kok , linux-pci maillist , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Jesse Brandeburg Subject: Re: Possible regression: MSI vector leakage since 2.6.18-rc5ish (Unable to repeatedly allocate/free MSI interrupt) References: <45BA82DA.6050201@intel.com> <45BBA2DD.50609@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1249 Lines: 31 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Auke Kok writes: > >> I highly doubt it - I've seen the problem even on this weeks git on >> x86_64. Moreover, I'm at home for the weekend and testing resources are limited >> :). I'll see what I can do > > Thanks. There may be more to it than what I suspect, but I could not > reproduce it on x86_64. > > Now I may have missed something as I optimized my tested based on the fact > that close and open are triggered when you up and down a network interface. > so I didn't do a complete rmmod, (since my network driver wasn't modular). > > Since you have seen this on x86_64 I will look deeper. gah, strike that. my only x86_64 system here survived the test with latest git tree. my 386 system here has no msi devices and I can't reinstall my x86_64 system since it's headless, so I can't test anything until monday. I'll give it a full test again and see which 2.6.20rc kernels did fail, most likely a much older tree (I suspect). Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/