From:   Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc:     Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: Use wake_up_worker() in wq_worker_sleeping() instead of open code
Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 20:31:39 +0800
Message-Id: <20211223123140.3789-4-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211223123140.3789-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
References: <20211223123140.3789-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>

The wakeup code in wq_worker_sleeping() is the same as wake_up_worker().

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b3207722671c..69cbe9e62bf1 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ void wq_worker_running(struct task_struct *task)
  */
 void wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task)
 {
-	struct worker *next, *worker = kthread_data(task);
+	struct worker *worker = kthread_data(task);
 	struct worker_pool *pool;
 
 	/*
@@ -918,11 +918,8 @@ void wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task)
 	}
 
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pool->nr_running) &&
-	    !list_empty(&pool->worklist)) {
-		next = first_idle_worker(pool);
-		if (next)
-			wake_up_process(next->task);
-	}
+	    !list_empty(&pool->worklist))
+		wake_up_worker(pool);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 }
 
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b