Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 07:32:28 -0600
From:   Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
CC:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <SantoshShilimkarssantosh@kernel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: smartreflex: Use platform_get_irq_optional() to
 get the interrupt
Message-ID: <20211223133228.7zy63enji7jkwuwc@enquirer>
References: <20211218153943.28014-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <20211220133145.uiww2nuormjks7gc@unruly>
 <CA+V-a8unRn=TJSnikVJffB3ebQn7RofoCn2yDLne15gW-ch9Yg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8unRn=TJSnikVJffB3ebQn7RofoCn2yDLne15gW-ch9Yg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Precedence: bulk

On 19:28-20211221, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
[...]
> Yes, the probe will fail silently in case of error while getting an
> interrupt if it exists in DT. Do you want me to add an error message
> in case of an error? I'll be sending v2 anyway dropping the check for
> IRQ0.

Yes please, please add an error message.

[...]
> rc should be OK, as there will be tree wide changes.

Lets try and do that (hopefully we should have a new respin by rc1).

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D)/Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D