Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC46FC43219 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349367AbhLWPnM (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:43:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34142 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349212AbhLWPlx (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:41:53 -0500 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72EC1C061394; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 07:41:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=/tyAvhoyg1hQEH2SYEuGFD0l8CiSoOd6tqxbhV2JRnI=; b=NNjVio1DVMhWyDn6xUSgP1zglG O0tafy2qc3LdNtt2vLhXe2B37ILp2eEVlum7DfDn2MdHLawS9OrfX/hPtEVtLOY1XnI3zRemoNgEw iI/vMYlqImaqdaYTLQ3xDM/q3Hb/CIz8NfD8azxF72VmmF9HnCiMEnwjIWDa0zgYLEwAx/RkjoA/v B4jqEA73t7b3c2xz/uOY6Wm5fxnsCjLe/NqVXxLzB7JM3iNhdexvJGa5bQGTTtiZsTE4JE0TVoyYV BVEtz7jYhobveE92sgyPApjjdjbxIm+j0bBAs9qnf5iA2EHVzTWaZf7Sbhzyy/eKhI9/DXD0A7pdj p+sINhPA==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n0QCs-0038Ey-VT; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:40:39 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 812A5300347; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:40:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 54C0E20CF2F9E; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:40:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:40:36 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Kristen Carlson Accardi , Kees Cook , Miklos Szeredi , Ard Biesheuvel , Tony Luck , Bruce Schlobohm , Jessica Yu , kernel test robot , Miroslav Benes , Evgenii Shatokhin , Jonathan Corbet , Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , Nick Desaulniers , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Arnd Bergmann , Josh Poimboeuf , Nathan Chancellor , Masami Hiramatsu , Marios Pomonis , Sami Tolvanen , "H.J. Lu" , Nicolas Pitre , Andy Lavr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] Function Granular KASLR Message-ID: References: <20211223002209.1092165-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> <20211223151504.1409203-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211223151504.1409203-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 04:15:04PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Alexander Lobakin > Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 01:21:54 +0100 > > > This is a massive rework and a respin of Kristen Accardi's marvellous > > FG-KASLR series (v5). > > [ snip ] > > > The series is also available here: [3] > > As per request, I've published a version rebased ontop of > linux-next-20211223 here: [4]. > > During the rebasing, I saw that some ASM code conflicts with, I > guess, Peter's "execute past ret" mitigation. > So I would also like to ask you to give me a branch which I should > pick to base my series on top of. There's a bunch of different x86 > branches, like several in peterz-queue, x86/core etc., so I got lost > a little. > The one posted yesterday was based on the mainline 5.16-rc6. For anything tip related, tip/master isn't a bad target. I did two asm related x86 series, both are in tip/x86/core I think (/me checks, yep). Never base anything of my queue.git, that's all throw-away/staging stuff. Either it lives and goes on into tip or not :-)