Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932078AbXA0Wiu (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:38:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752060AbXA0Wiu (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:38:50 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:55395 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751954AbXA0Wit (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:38:49 -0500 Message-ID: <45BBD475.4050101@garzik.org> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:38:45 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jay Cliburn CC: csnook@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, atl1-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] atl1: Ancillary C files for Attansic L1 driver References: <20070121210737.GE2702@osprey.hogchain.net> <20070121183151.4be61ebf.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <45B43093.6060500@bellsouth.net> <20070122200004.GA12553@dreamland.darkstar.lan> <20070123112522.65aac61b@freekitty> <20070123211917.GA22109@dreamland.darkstar.lan> <45BBBDD0.7030809@bellsouth.net> <45BBC10C.5010103@garzik.org> <45BBCCA2.4090902@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <45BBCCA2.4090902@bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1425 Lines: 40 Jay Cliburn wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> As a driver maintainer, you need to patch sets, and submit them in a >> timely fashion to me. Note I said patch set, not patch, in following >> with Rule #3 from Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Also make sure to >> review http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html > > Understood. Both references reviewed. Thanks. > > Sorry, but one last question... These two patches generated overnight > by Andrew: > > Message-Id: <200701270710.l0R7AhLj004217@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> > Subject: + git-netdev-all-atl1-pm-fix.patch added to -mm tree > > and > > Message-Id: <200701270708.l0R78Q0o004191@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> > Subject: + git-netdev-all-atl1-build-fix.patch added to -mm tree > > Do I include these in my patch set that I submit to you, or do you apply > them to netdev directly? There is no hard and fast rule. If the patch is obvious and submitted in correct form (Andrew's notifications are not in such a form), then I might go ahead and apply it. But I usually reply to the patch with "applied" if so. In general, you can answer this question yourself. Look at netdev-2.6.git#atl1 and see what's in there. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/