Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932471AbXA1JMn (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:12:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932474AbXA1JMm (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:12:42 -0500 Received: from postfix2-g20.free.fr ([212.27.60.43]:36659 "EHLO postfix2-g20.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932471AbXA1JMm (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:12:42 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Q] Prefered suspend to ram or disk method ? X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.2; nmh 1.2; GNU Emacs 22.0.51 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:09:16 +0100 Message-ID: <23972.1169975356@localhost> From: Xavier Maillard Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 734 Lines: 26 Hi there, Just a quick and easy question for you. I am aware of three ways to make my laptop suspend/hibernate: 1. suspend 2. ususpend 3. suspend2 The first two are directly part of the official linux distribution and the third one is easy to install into it. Here is my question: what is the recommended method ? How does suspend compare to ususpend/suspend2 ? Is there any chance to see suspend2 be part of the official linux distribution in a near future or not ? Regards, Xavier - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/