MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201216165239.2744-1-grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>
 <20210106232704.GE9149@xps15> <11303a1b-5ab4-def5-77b1-c500894c9c87@ti.com>
 <20210107224448.GB43045@xps15> <75365443-57e3-e2e0-5865-f78af9d5890b@ti.com>
 <b0e32ad0-487f-9d57-7287-835eee836514@oracle.com> <c5252e8d-094a-dcb7-7ccb-172e58ab3413@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <c5252e8d-094a-dcb7-7ccb-172e58ab3413@ti.com>
From:   Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Dec 2021 14:00:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH9NwWfJHRc5A5D4qwU_wzGhLzQiYwkOq9RtLGc2SpnruKKHxA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API
To:     Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc:     "santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, ssantosh@kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        praneeth@ti.com, rogerq@kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

HI all,

Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 06:58 Uhr schrieb Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>:
>
> Hi Santosh,
>
> On 1/24/21 10:34 PM, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote:
> > Hi Suman, Mathieu,
> >
> > On 1/7/21 2:49 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> >> On 1/7/21 4:44 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 06:03:25PM -0600, Suman Anna wrote:
> >>>> Hi Mathieu,
> >>>>
> > [...]
> >>> I only see input from Andy and Lars in the thread you point out, nothing from
> >>> Greg.  I have also taken a look at the patch [1] that made checkpatch complain
> >>> about ENOTSUPP.  From what I see in that commit log the goal is to prevent new
> >>> additions of ENOTSUPP to the kernel.
> >>>
> >>> Please modify and resend, otherwise I'm sure someone will send another patch to
> >>> fix it before the end of the cycle.
> >>
> >> Yeah ok. I will send out a v3.
> >>
> > I haven't seen v3 of this series yet. Please post it
> > if you would like to include it for 5.12.
>
> This series is dependent on couple of patches that would have to come through
> the remoteproc tree first, and I need to post the next versions of those as
> well. So, let me sort out those first. You can drop this from your queue for 5.12.
>

Is there any update on this patch series?

-- 
greets
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc

https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy