Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:04:07 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
       Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: lockmeter
Message-ID: <20070128170407.GA1526@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20070128115118.837777000@programming.kicks-ass.net> <20070128144325.GB16552@infradead.org> <20070128152404.GB9196@elte.hu> <45BCD4C9.2030302@mbligh.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45BCD4C9.2030302@mbligh.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 690
Lines: 14

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:52:25AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Mmm. not wholly convinced that's true. Whilst i don't have lockmeter
> stats to hand, the heavy time in __d_lookup seems to indicate we may
> still have a problem to me. I guess we could move the spinlocks out
> of line again to test this fairly easily (or get lockmeter upstream).

We definitly should get lockmeter in.  Does anyone volunteer for doing
the cleanup and merged?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/