Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932787AbXA1TtN (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:49:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932794AbXA1TtN (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:49:13 -0500 Received: from hobbit.corpit.ru ([81.13.94.6]:24267 "EHLO hobbit.corpit.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932787AbXA1TtL (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:49:11 -0500 Message-ID: <45BCFE33.3000600@tls.msk.ru> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:49:07 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Davidsen CC: Marc Perkel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Raid 10 question/problem [ot] References: <478459.76045.qm@web52503.mail.yahoo.com> <45BCDFAE.5090602@tmr.com> In-Reply-To: <45BCDFAE.5090602@tmr.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=4F9CF57E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 718 Lines: 18 Bill Davidsen wrote: [] > RAID-10 is not the same as RAID 0+1. It is. Yes, there's separate module for raid10, but what it - basically - does is the same as raid0 module over two raid1 modules will do. It's just a bit more efficient (less levels, more room for optimisations), easy to use (you'll have single array instead of at least 3), and a bit more flexible; at the same way it's less widely tested... But the end result is basically the same for both ways. /mjt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/