Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932828AbXA1UZi (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:25:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932830AbXA1UZi (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:25:38 -0500 Received: from dvhart.com ([64.146.134.43]:44874 "EHLO dvhart.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932828AbXA1UZh (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:25:37 -0500 Message-ID: <45BD06AC.1080008@mbligh.org> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:25:16 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070104) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Bug report : reproducible memory allocator bug in 2.6.19.2 References: <20070128200917.GA16571@Krystal> In-Reply-To: <20070128200917.GA16571@Krystal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 963 Lines: 23 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to build cross-compilers (or kernels) on a 2-way x86_64 (amd64) with > make -j3 triggers the following OOPS after about 30 minutes on > 2.6.19.2. Due to the amount of time and the heavy load it takes before it > happens, I suspect a race condition. Memtest86 tests passed ok. The > amount of swap used when the condition happens is about 52k and stable > (only ~800MB/1GB are used). > > I am going to give it a look, but I suspect you might help narrowing it > down more quickly. Any insight would be appreciated. Mmm. that's going to be messy to debug ... but didn't we already know that kernel was racy? Or is 2.6.19.2 after that fix already? Does 20-rc6 still break? M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/