Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B055AC433F5 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232482AbhL1NUi (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:20:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40934 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231948AbhL1NUh (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:20:37 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6DBDC061574; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:20:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id bg19-20020a05600c3c9300b0034565e837b6so6252710wmb.1; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:20:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7FUkdvJGNxKGVQILwNgD77NHubBmu0IRPeW8D+iKZDg=; b=WYM3oQBw9UhKGnTNxJOLsUxkyzspC1DPfUe33e7iq31PQGxOz4e6WX4gJ7x36M1G3U THHZkcu+cKYOnGZgFzHmvVyMNYJ1QzycwsF80ifwAKyt/5PBMffjEYwxVnDYvRZD2rHM Shb3pqSvFZ0lE14/67cDMxTQZTTXZ0sNsUEcBnjsrth3su4xKUgKF+r19gtQIPyFBdJU hw4yudVQ0w3EHAX2J/SFFKFeISx1Z14DQRcUT9VnVxfEB3Jprh9cQEWNFlmoRKtCD2O5 U3gxrTX8SaU0gfRrUJ9NgTngzM5gnT+jyK8biF6dsMQuuT7zFI0k6AK0JZFPjFMdPWm8 pWFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7FUkdvJGNxKGVQILwNgD77NHubBmu0IRPeW8D+iKZDg=; b=34eeM9rUElEONhctpDz6WZO2sqFHRkxDBuSmoJYqklLDhab7nE7hckU3BzU6vQOcfP QoSwJdeE/1rFvExaw0lEapunThlozo4zx1Mq5080lRbcv/oxOQFA4if9cM1+p66S7cse aQHMArEU2wMR7r6xOt2FBHccXfTMqLn9WkmcDep1HNyg5Bf1FlQc0Y9i10yiJlDOMy5k MY2unwqJ1b9TrdTjuMUctjT/YV4J5l192Dfjm9/FxJtSlm/Y165/+kS1KSC1GAstUl6l 6NI327tcIGzr2hFYXFeSOEPloq16WYccWsWFu0nqJE1YIVjikcP/r3GpvyNpNEN/Av1G Lf6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rBqRuIv64EKywVls+wps/7lN/YiM3ygQteY74zTVuqVnL3UYX 15uA3gTM3yRRK0vgaBhoz3I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9FcJCfnhV1O77mJ7rOUYtloV3Sl1FNM2SY5WONAq4wb0NTav4yPAyanTb8a/apuTxT6ggpQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c198:: with SMTP id y24mr17060280wmi.1.1640697635353; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:20:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p21sm19146554wmq.20.2021.12.28.05.20.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 05:20:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:20:33 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/47] 5.4.169-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20211227151320.801714429@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211227151320.801714429@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 04:30:36PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.169 release. > There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:13:09 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/557 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip