Date:   Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:22:39 +0000
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/76] 5.10.89-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YcsPnw4seY3sK1/F@debian>
References: <20211227151324.694661623@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211227151324.694661623@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 04:30:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.89 release.
> There are 76 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:13:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/556
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/559


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip