Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 05:15:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 05:15:29 -0500 Received: from [62.245.135.174] ([62.245.135.174]:45442 "EHLO mail.teraport.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 05:15:12 -0500 Message-ID: <3BFCD029.DAED8BF7@TeraPort.de> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 11:15:05 +0100 From: Martin Knoblauch Organization: TeraPort GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.13-ac4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mjustice@boxxtech.com CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , S.Akhtary@TeraPort.de Subject: Re: Tuning Linux for high-speed disk subsystems X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 11/22/2001 11:15:04 AM, Serialize by Router on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 11/22/2001 11:15:11 AM, Serialize complete at 11/22/2001 11:15:11 AM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Re: Tuning Linux for high-speed disk subsystems > > > > As I count your disks may be the double for the best case. I read here on > > LKML a post that someone claims that W2k deliever 250 MB/s with such a > > configuration. Linux 2.4 should do the same. Ask the SCSI gurus. > > > > That may have been my post you refer to. With 2x5 disks, each capable of > 50 MB/s by itself, we can stream 255 MB/s very smoothly in either direction > with W2K --- as long as FILE_FLAG_NOBUFFER is used. With standard > reads the number is more like 100 MB/s if I recall correctly, so the buffer > cache can definitely get in the way. > > With Linux + XFS I was getting 250 MB/s read and 220 MB/s write (with a > bit less smoothness than W2K) using O_DIRECT and no high mem to avoid > bounce buffer copies. Using standard reads the numbers drop to around > 120 MB/s. That was a couple of weeks ago and I want to try tweaking some > more but a co-worker has "borrowed" pieces of the hardware for the moment. > Marvin, could you elaborate a bit more :-), or point me/us to your post (couldn't find it). We are currently evaluating solutions for doing HDTV playback for one of our customers. This will need about 300-320 MB/sec read. We know (at least someone claims so) that you can do it with SGI equipment at a price. The goal for the customer is to definitely beat that price :-)) Martin -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/