Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 05:43:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 05:43:13 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.133] ([194.213.32.133]:36993 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 05:42:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:31:19 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Dave Jones Cc: Patrick Mochel , James Simmons , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: New Power Managment code Message-ID: <20011121003119.A37@toy.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To:

Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from davej@suse.de on Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 07:02:21PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > The power management transitions live in the most recent ACPI code, which > > you can get from Intel: > > Something I'm curious on wrt to this new work. Would it make sense for > these callbacks to get called before/after APM suspend as well as ACPI ? > (I'm thinking of older pre-ACPI compliant boxes). With apm, bios/hw should do state saving itself. Doing it from os only makes sense in order to work around bios bugs. It probably should not be done as default. Pavel -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/