Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B68C433F5 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240599AbhL2PlY (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 10:41:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50566 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240591AbhL2PlW (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 10:41:22 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com (mail-oi1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B345AC061401 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:41:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id i9so27291148oih.4 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:41:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=k8xcoM08aGsQ9cgOiWILeKp3rFeqCGSS3Z+ipGXVLHU=; b=rwvDoEk/kN13V2PMeafxRzr64jH39i+khURkn4NYSnLlyLDE/zubrsMHorgomf5ZdW ofdrt4LcayFTFAIXQ218p3IxCVFu/IKFBucpaYzXAsWKTEWAyzrI+OrMwYp9SR02kxXG YBDmORwtu8QGG6Y5Cg2QDtFrQivrTANYT33g+6TKqV4zbbo/4P8QdULaRtc7cQdpax1Z 4NvEKbWPnXyVXrcyQ8e18xEppjuy694uWVwou/u/tJFYsiwVfPK/ZmOISZlJo/HjD0Mu 0hfN5DDDwSvPuHXaaNVQttJq7LNjVZ/QjvKY9Bqc72QaCwuu+ojUEm/uCESmSH8imDI8 5rJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=k8xcoM08aGsQ9cgOiWILeKp3rFeqCGSS3Z+ipGXVLHU=; b=qnUCcAvNUaNghjDdM749ZkEZEYAzY0ZG5IlSnP2sEYk66u0p8o3d0Np5BEFAkGPrAA SQH3EtncvN+Menqdx0mqMCMpOHFIXlyLbhjv4cpST1jEMDAL8IiBXn+bE8J7qv5bbN35 8tzeit7tfVvR03QF8oIlmlRWTvG9eFrTMx7upVxhiamd9NWa77QPnNaEO3FKkJZ6gNCm NL6kpqqhzQnWoBW0yGmNZRJkzgHI+qo03WSvtJylLGw81C/52uTr0LpigNNX6FrDfS49 zLb4i62fmhfAPFLHW8PT1ZlCpPZ6Ag9B/Uzt/I0tXZYtPSsVXSG/nFRYqUin1Q/KfUdk WbHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rBhGNwH7ulbV2A1mBsoOHamGceKN4Sqtk7k3JyDmWIjNDThwe qEKh3+OkC+qb6cfNPtqOOEadCw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJUr/fpObTJMHPrT/NkF6fQxl07QYgOqC8iAwJuKY/YU1wquZM9/dXbiKugVMhqjvafFZ8sA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1396:: with SMTP id c22mr21870052oiw.59.1640792481997; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:41:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ripper (104-57-184-186.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [104.57.184.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k101sm3988166otk.60.2021.12.29.07.41.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:41:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:42:19 -0800 From: Bjorn Andersson To: 20200622075956.171058-5-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Baolin Wang , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Drop tcsr_mutex syscon Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat 25 Dec 06:57 PST 2021, David Heidelberg wrote: > Hello, > > any particular reason, why you did applied this patch only to sm8250? > I was working on a 8250 board when this annoyed me, and I wanted to keep the "example" clean so I only did that platform and then forgot to go back and clean up the rest. (Same thing with the smem compatible moving to reserved-memory). > Is it safe to convert rest of tcsr-mutex nodes to new schema without > additional testing? > I can't think of any reason it wouldn't be safe, so please feel free to prepare a patch. Thanks, Bjorn