Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA51C433F5 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 15:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238546AbhL3P3v (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:29:51 -0500 Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.230]:46625 "EHLO new4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236492AbhL3P3u (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:29:50 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A3F580390; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:29:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=PeK1SwXweHmcMIKsN9xO7bPrTKl nfkcB/zGp4yM0vHQ=; b=goitL7zogb3Vw5mO8T4AogbyHlIDbWk2FLpsCFlokbZ wUiyMvqyN3bUU4seHo3s/1NQecupaSATdoowyCZiQ5AyyYUs7Zh/vFEnkbNt6fGX wIpQGT5Cte1/1z5TYGviRQYUyq1y+KYZqBJdUW7gfvBddO7vTI9WOSCuhcAYYcyH Bu4QB0Y5fdxG3tB3ZGvWrAgX4Wp4RcRWcsMjHofciX9Io4S6JMIT9klzX9h1mIJK PxILJsHrZmTm/+R+L/GuVkiha3Yezmwavh+b+FiyB+HxNhEMnh7wjEP6rs3pjR3Q gu25R0YZBzKfHiW5M5/rta05RV8VqRsXIWuaY94lSWA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=PeK1Sw XweHmcMIKsN9xO7bPrTKlnfkcB/zGp4yM0vHQ=; b=dxwZ263E5RRHIp1OW0yVNi twOowHLYXvXYaRj+tsu+q2AhVWTDsPNPSTwAJl9Xekq9a+6/4/E+gajpcczQY8ay VOzEaqQk9vTPuw9BaMB4v+/eb6Pb9050tt9MdM8jJWMwq6K6P+Rkvr7v/yIG0CIv 7BlnHGA2c9h+1G5unRLiJWnW98+DDM/MxchnYbXkS+FU3EysKMMCs0cKOHjMSjyJ 7BfRkmqXA9Gnm/5JJzBIhEfnQf4VVR2xnsJlmvV6Spi0+H6F5FXaJP443x3c3O1n txOO6w3/mf9R4DUe7Ko9Cb1Nd352XF7eaXLDk8RZBUb/WMWBIvW9apBmTCMR7hew == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddvfedgjeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgtkhcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceophgrthhrihgtkhessh htfigtgidrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgeehheefffegkeevhedthffgudfh geefgfdthefhkedtleffveekgfeuffehtdeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgrthhrihgtkhesshhtfigtgidrgiihii X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:29:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 09:29:46 -0600 From: Patrick Williams To: Pratyush Yadav , Joel Stanley Cc: Tudor Ambarus , Michael Walle , Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Joel Stanley , Andrew Jeffery , Potin Lai , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: aspeed-smc: improve probe resilience Message-ID: References: <20211229143334.297305-1-patrick@stwcx.xyz> <20211229173411.l2bipmi4x3arqjoo@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HEhOyDGNPr5K1QDH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211229173411.l2bipmi4x3arqjoo@ti.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --HEhOyDGNPr5K1QDH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:04:13PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On 29/12/21 08:33AM, Patrick Williams wrote: =20 > The patch itself looks fine to me but we no longer want to maintain=20 > drivers under drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/. They should be moved to= =20 > implement the SPI MEM API (under drivers/spi/). Is the linux-aspeed community aware of this? Are you saying you don't want= to take fixes for their driver into the MTD tree? Can it be pulled into the A= speed tree? > Could you please volunteer to do the conversion for this driver? I'm not personally going to be able to get to it for at least the next 3 mo= nths. It looks like we don't have a dedicated maintainer for this driver other th= an Joel by nature of him being listed as the maintainer of "ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT". I'm not sure if Aspeed themselves are planning on doing the nece= ssary refactoring here. Joel, are you aware of this driver using a deprecated implementation? Were there anyone planning to do the reworks that you are aware of? I'd like to= get this fix at least into the OpenBMC kernel tree because I'm seeing this fail= in the real world. --=20 Patrick Williams --HEhOyDGNPr5K1QDH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAmHN0GkACgkQqwNHzC0A wRm3mw//YWhGsoq3nvfbqICOBABeacq8/jETQMaKxf8gyrjUq3wiv4dRedTgkLUz p5qJkV7CRz1rjKYs/DDokUVdOS3xUvW3N8D1pkNA+OyZ2u+XDSAByGdXU++8uBdC 3aueTRa8W0Cha744JYGvipggXqtW1g9OHug+AfRrTDtUkv/YXVF9PHw2hIf4oqk5 wPypiUYKdCrjzTR9BM3s9gEGJIxSqDcBmHbycoqECB60AAoNk148B6UcKD48rKlf UZdhvt9eV5YlHdCM0XIM9TcrMvpVuRxxaO5exV0ND1fzWXlEgwlBBwvqaI+xTFQ9 ojyLi8D0IbDDN+e5JYDFZqAPqkzW8939tdfOFw1PgoJIVqF+7gbIoFNMqn3mMbYO JFBOcJSRC8NsK64WHr582OX+I1b9cGWEVgtqnH5/0QbKxIqPzpyFn0X+Pf43YeX/ U7czaxM+yc2UhptT006hhe4X+E5KpadMGspxpLaKo7u/UEJMw+24rAaXyvQoU13B WBlms+AQC0TzbqpYbC60cQpTUkLiDhTXoEFMDOy9up49OrgHp4W0uT+wZOv5iboe H37VdpZeQCjkcldIti5iG0FaPpGCjHQcexCdIP357U19qPUK/w0czq5jZRv1wekn VJ5IdlTrh6H+FTkdk+vKeXkhgiBlaGo30r2VzMNG9dP2qpVhuw8= =xdO4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HEhOyDGNPr5K1QDH--