Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6963CC433EF for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 16:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240308AbhL3QXZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:23:25 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41]:33625 "EHLO mail-qv1-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239850AbhL3QXY (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:23:24 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f41.google.com with SMTP id kk22so22550025qvb.0; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:23:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Qeblw1m9b1lBZnq56cGE3LlH8ljA2Kqb7IdC+pWcyJo=; b=ay8mOfUG/vh2e3ifneSu+X/ntxD6DEUMwNVKU7ZutA6sKgTyqPjXSbY7ChbVM/5Mun rj43lUf/bkV5dVtCC3rMqVWICXrtjoMRNMo2VWPtIAOQzdodVOZFzRlOv+wfENFvUlvS k4ruuiyyZAQ63fPsynooikuOdCPKVRs6pLYAEbcpG4XLSCiLeu/arubkmkbquxFhDq6k cbSY8ut+QYI9+UItScGkhLjWzCgQ3pgMINQ74TlBIWpLuuHnTdQf6HgeU+T0pBTndZ45 rQe0UTiGwpT3NScYAFiaVGwWkbUyAAUCB2fBe3vGvc0MN9Ta8dMYUmHyznqJ+Y+85IM7 OS7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5337TmYn5GtDqj6fGbjFEPEIXdSgZrbj5fmhDAWQlmS2DLMz8NMN lkSy5xH1CNK7jH5tAowPai5FT+jedWjA+9TvSuc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCW9LoTGevH6Tb21On6CNI5HU3B20jNAR6zTBdM5kRKtjktxDkmh0EyBzZ4t/fi7OZ3z0LdI+r0wEdGB2yeEg= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5c8b:: with SMTP id o11mr27548806qvh.130.1640881403809; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:23:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211222191411.13805-1-manfred@colorfullife.com> In-Reply-To: <20211222191411.13805-1-manfred@colorfullife.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 17:23:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c: avoid cpufreq_get_policy() To: Manfred Spraul Cc: LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Zhang Rui , Len Brown , 1vier1@web.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 8:14 PM Manfred Spraul wrote: > > cpu_has_cpufreq() stores a 'struct cpufreq_policy' on the stack. > Unfortunately, with debugging options enabled, the structure can be > larger than 1024 bytes, which causes a compiler warning/error. > > (actually observed: 1184 bytes). > > Therefore: Switch to cpufreq_cpu_get(). > > Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul > > --- > drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c > index a3d34e3f9f94..74210d63f62c 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c > @@ -53,10 +53,19 @@ static int phys_package_first_cpu(int cpu) > > static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu) > { > - struct cpufreq_policy policy; > - if (!acpi_processor_cpufreq_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu)) > + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; > + int retval; Why is this needed? > + > + if (!acpi_processor_cpufreq_init) > return 0; > - return 1; > + > + retval = 0; > + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); > + if (policy) { > + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); return 1; > + retval = 1; > + } > + return retval; return 0; > } > > static int cpufreq_get_max_state(unsigned int cpu) > -- > 2.33.1 >