Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA616C433EF for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 19:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241825AbhL3T05 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 14:26:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49092 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233682AbhL3T0y (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 14:26:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EDF1C061574 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:26:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id p14so18862750plf.3 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:26:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TZUph+1LIEWHwkUrkggqde2R87m4Flj/r9dmdwLX5Gk=; b=YjPirROoPg13DarDjbdzx+b6JXQsjXJAroXjMUwNDC76kjIF6C1cS8keBNKHMwtVRz ISz7aWmvSYfhUT0/mv+fQimuFcM7IpQYiGSj5GneQoSRXJf27E+/a7kX/zz7OILY+ohR KvvILQ1tJEBcxhfEfb4Sze3gNLGOdNBvx2AM7nRMVaOKJ6zXjhHHSmfR5Ea/RkSYkONc Vv5TuUD92KHd0ioNQnac3ovtQjfZUOUlYaj5MyVEagQy5v7ICbkHPQwcB/friSppUclP moI5YE9d9gjNvOeLdaVxqsBZYX+6aAerSR+/sdxPKQZlefucqnMpLtkqSkdgP7uOLynp C4Hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TZUph+1LIEWHwkUrkggqde2R87m4Flj/r9dmdwLX5Gk=; b=k5mUJ4dzoUzRKNlStefUErAlk0mlJdDrbKyF/eClGv3ZhbiqL4kGrO91MVxgt+GEug 0g/JLa9ijth8Lxm4rnPAqDlqSZUmEs4NNN3oeGR+V254npDTs0YV2KQp/a0259U3+jWb NjKD/9MEm80J8M8odX2JSE7D8QeWTicPRUopfQhhtpgVD2yIxIet9ifu11OV0l443bH5 JbiCsTTdURTGUTI36h98SUFQ7/+mWjgGf5XQL74eRJXV5fJOSdE0Nyvd6XfnXyV2KHyg 6UpcOcrYuqbNKK9fj2lf/76qxDDJA7+ksvNnbQ5zzbe25jb4NlVdKugQ8/H7ZGwkpehY vcfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oe0cQ1gdnu+BzJ1oQqYVeDo85Ourco2My7NhnwqNgglg50Ejh bhR2khik3z9L+Rx4U044NP1cUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy75H5vqTjoxkUn2lk86SVP6fu7EF2sx90j7RLzIByICIqLM9zp/fNPB/CyaOJtZQ2wXQ2z2A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ab53:b0:149:7902:bc8f with SMTP id ij19-20020a170902ab5300b001497902bc8fmr22576921plb.85.1640892413370; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u71sm23209813pgd.68.2021.12.30.11.26.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:26:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 19:26:49 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: David Stevens Cc: Marc Zyngier , Paolo Bonzini , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Will Deacon , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] KVM: mmu: introduce new gfn_to_pfn_page functions Message-ID: References: <20211129034317.2964790-1-stevensd@google.com> <20211129034317.2964790-2-stevensd@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211129034317.2964790-2-stevensd@google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, David Stevens wrote: > +static kvm_pfn_t ensure_pfn_ref(struct page *page, kvm_pfn_t pfn) "ensure" is rather misleading as that implies this is _just_ an assertion, but that's not true since it elevates the refcount. Maybe kvm_try_get_page_ref()? > +{ > + if (page || is_error_pfn(pfn)) A comment above here would be very helpful. It's easy to overlook the "page" check and think that KVM is double-counting pages. E.g. /* If @page is valid, KVM already has a reference to the pfn/page. */ That would tie in nicely with the kvm_try_get_page_ref() name too. > + return pfn; > + > + /* > + * If we're here, a pfn resolved by hva_to_pfn_remapped is > + * going to be returned to something that ultimately calls > + * kvm_release_pfn_clean, so the refcount needs to be bumped if > + * the pfn isn't a reserved pfn. > + * > + * Whoever called remap_pfn_range is also going to call e.g. > + * unmap_mapping_range before the underlying pages are freed, > + * causing a call to our MMU notifier. > + * > + * Certain IO or PFNMAP mappings can be backed with valid > + * struct pages, but be allocated without refcounting e.g., > + * tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations, which > + * would then underflow the refcount when the caller does the > + * required put_page. Don't allow those pages here. > + */ > + if (kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn) || > + get_page_unless_zero(pfn_to_page(pfn))) > + return pfn; > + > + return KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT; > +}