Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F50C433EF for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 12:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231926AbiACMql (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2022 07:46:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44522 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229514AbiACMqk (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2022 07:46:40 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F96EC061761 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 04:46:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA1CB80EA9 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 12:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB2A6C36AED; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 12:46:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1641213997; bh=CGvn79ZkDcvPxOZWiXROS4Ze1GHzxqDuSnGemc1SEHY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hY1nIUyZy3jwZNhX/TDC+i3Xxa3PAqPV4hoeSR4LegJ8s+j0sie0iFmOqah/7FnuJ VNOnAO60sgK6upXzJzRV9CfDsnCJ5xQS4uUNaPbzVPxCs74lXcZde7xqGKKVjH4lbX oFFfNsCfMhzwkcni+VdyaqHIn9jzu7koEgrzF8o4= Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:46:34 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Peter Rosin Cc: Aswath Govindraju , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: mux for 5.17-rc1 Message-ID: References: <94ab71e1-2e68-def2-95b8-33162172f65c@axentia.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94ab71e1-2e68-def2-95b8-33162172f65c@axentia.se> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 11:34:12PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi Greg, > > These have been in -next since around x-mas, and hopefully it's not too > late to push them for the upcoming window. > > Patch 5/6 fails check-patch due to lacking a message body, because I > forgot to actually check that and now I can't find it in me to re-spin > for that seemingly insignificant issue. If it really is a no-no, then > please just drop that patch. It's a no-go, please take a break and find it in you for the next time you resend this series :) I'll take patches 1 and 2, the rest need work. thanks, greg k-h