From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20K=C3=B6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de>,
        Dan Moulding <dmoulding@me.com>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 54/73] drm/nouveau: wait for the exclusive fence after the shared ones v2
Date:   Mon,  3 Jan 2022 15:24:15 +0100
Message-Id: <20220103142058.666219405@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220103142056.911344037@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20220103142056.911344037@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

commit 67f74302f45d5d862f22ced3297624e50ac352f0 upstream.

Always waiting for the exclusive fence resulted on some performance
regressions. So try to wait for the shared fences first, then the
exclusive fence should always be signaled already.

v2: fix incorrectly placed "(", add some comment why we do this.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de>
Tested-by: Dan Moulding <dmoulding@me.com>
Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211209102335.18321-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c |   28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
@@ -353,15 +353,22 @@ nouveau_fence_sync(struct nouveau_bo *nv
 
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-	}
 
-	fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(resv);
-	fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(resv);
+		fobj = NULL;
+	} else {
+		fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(resv);
+	}
 
-	if (fence) {
+	/* Waiting for the exclusive fence first causes performance regressions
+	 * under some circumstances. So manually wait for the shared ones first.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < (fobj ? fobj->shared_count : 0) && !ret; ++i) {
 		struct nouveau_channel *prev = NULL;
 		bool must_wait = true;
 
+		fence = rcu_dereference_protected(fobj->shared[i],
+						dma_resv_held(resv));
+
 		f = nouveau_local_fence(fence, chan->drm);
 		if (f) {
 			rcu_read_lock();
@@ -373,20 +380,13 @@ nouveau_fence_sync(struct nouveau_bo *nv
 
 		if (must_wait)
 			ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, intr);
-
-		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (!exclusive || !fobj)
-		return ret;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < fobj->shared_count && !ret; ++i) {
+	fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(resv);
+	if (fence) {
 		struct nouveau_channel *prev = NULL;
 		bool must_wait = true;
 
-		fence = rcu_dereference_protected(fobj->shared[i],
-						dma_resv_held(resv));
-
 		f = nouveau_local_fence(fence, chan->drm);
 		if (f) {
 			rcu_read_lock();
@@ -398,6 +398,8 @@ nouveau_fence_sync(struct nouveau_bo *nv
 
 		if (must_wait)
 			ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, intr);
+
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	return ret;