Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752087AbXA2VpW (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:45:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752089AbXA2VpW (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:45:22 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:54848 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752087AbXA2VpU (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:45:20 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update From: john stultz To: Andrew Morton Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Arjan van de Veen , Roman Zippel In-Reply-To: <1170106290.1296.22.camel@localhost> References: <20070123211159.178138000@localhost.localdomain> <20070127181759.eb7fe5e8.akpm@osdl.org> <1170106290.1296.22.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:45:15 -0800 Message-Id: <1170107115.1296.23.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 542 Lines: 16 On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:31 -0800, john stultz wrote: > Should I just revive the old 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 patches against your current > tree and re-submit? Or should the HRT bits get settled first? Thomas just pointed out that I had missed that the bits are back in -mm2. Sorry for the noise. -john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/