Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494C1C433EF for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 23:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231204AbiACX4U (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:56:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54752 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229487AbiACX4T (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:56:19 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4736FC061761; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 15:56:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id w20so63651274wra.9; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 15:56:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I1Rz8pAdirwGM9T3HIP+P00havvKoNIpSMikJMk4xuA=; b=l1TLyKDxIWoNP61xoNqAIsR5ZXVTRkwFIIbN39ESptPewJNODXHNlwWBtLoG9HYtEc XRF70sk4h8l3t/yrWjjgTHJXQLdU8V2nqfZRyWpy3IEZ95aXOxJsqRVflmBnYrO70DDI XC3W6dlci58vB+c7I76nY0JsjxNBVrMJUsZiwO794+uk8V+kYjOJ1vcAlXSk2mdSowJp DzyZPjLFVqZ9Z/CrhK9sxT7qHA6m+mrZW2KwObRkDdqF6WpLHqueV+vRIxJrYV593ZoD dsd4KRRWT4np5nLPe2daYgVo3jFrTOKwOFHBG3O+j3PVctfw21NhGROXErQLTye3TxjP FQpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I1Rz8pAdirwGM9T3HIP+P00havvKoNIpSMikJMk4xuA=; b=SY6KsQ4+oIxVHkyivDol9F2EAAHPl5kenBWVBkcr4wVtQ9nuBEGAXBT2rkYVbJ7x/B X+8WB6XkGVLTPLwGdy29+BvX2jwJXzSkJIjW2ZUcCOJvx7mWgnGoipWvHtnXpKqwf7Ft SQfRZ8aPJ6jSb1YVRt0sk4NWjgpa9i3xxb/OpPwwWiMaEWQMlPBgKn5uZeFUM1sz5aoS ey37NZ1DMrdDVP3rLva42dHxCJ4OcAjZFIFInV/X775YumIucdwWpkTlwQK6noP61x4u dW40sncKkF9bHe4wmW34QTErxnu1/VaZthfwVkU9mYL3LXjve7NV4AR+14sJ8nPxDY8r QmBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531uFMGTkyjG4a+/9cCNFzOHWiUBWuvWm7A7HblRKg08S4EV9Sfz eSqMY6tpgOnKYxxVB/zep4wLsRQJ1UGqJw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydApjo/eUINfLzPGnStLthDkSaE0q2Z2j8ZkMOnh33GyoFB7ZRNdQITakAoHupPo6877Yq+g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1acb:: with SMTP id i11mr39204935wry.244.1641254177336; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 15:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from fuji.fritz.box (ip-89-161-76-237.tel.tkb.net.pl. [89.161.76.237]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w21sm30996188wmi.19.2022.01.03.15.56.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 15:56:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 00:56:13 +0100 From: Tomasz =?UTF-8?B?V2FybmllxYLFgm8=?= To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Jani Nikula , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: kernel-doc: transform documentation into POD Message-ID: <20220104005613.227f0432@fuji.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <8735m4zdlv.fsf@meer.lwn.net> References: <20211209225549.69010-1-tomasz.warniello@gmail.com> <87h7b8cfg0.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <0796a780-f5ee-0b6c-e7ef-544ba5f6a429@gmail.com> <87pmp9tcju.fsf@intel.com> <20220103183034.77ba8a8c@fuji.fritz.box> <87bl0sziva.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <20220103224806.2932bac2@fuji.fritz.box> <8735m4zdlv.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:57:48 -0700 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > One thread per version is good; please do not post new versions to old > threads. A tool like "git send-email" can be your friend here. See > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for lots of details on how > to submit patches. Ok, thanks. I'll try to do it correctly this time... > Along these lines, I appreciate that you broke up the series as I > requested, but you overdid it a bit. Think in terms of logical changes > and making things easy to review, and you should be able to coalesce > things a bit. I'm not good at guessing what seems logical to others, especially those I don't know much. No sarcasm here. Luckily it's not that many of them, so hopefully they'll pass the exam overdone as they are. > >> - Stick with current coding conventions > > > > To be honest, I need to think this over. > > Think hard; if you're unable to work with the kernel project's > conventions, there's not a lot of point in resubmitting the patches. Let's finish this one together. As for the actual code corrections, I see I put 1 tab too many in two places in the last version. So I guess I just need to reduce them by 1? No sarcasm again... So let me know before I've sent the next version, if you please. Ch, TW