Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933022AbXA2WmN (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:42:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933085AbXA2WmM (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:42:12 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:40807 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933029AbXA2WmL (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:42:11 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14842415 From: Alessandro Di Marco To: Pavel Machek Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0 References: <87wt3dhlte.fsf@gmx.it> <20070123163442.GA18662@elf.ucw.cz> <87lkjthdmd.fsf@gmx.it> <20070123184432.GE18662@elf.ucw.cz> <873b61cf1v.fsf@gmx.it> <20070126171536.GB964@elf.ucw.cz> <878xfpoeom.fsf@gmx.it> <20070127174525.GA4787@ucw.cz> <20070127192034.GA17652@suse.cz> <874pqanddd.fsf@gmx.it> <20070129222833.GB17330@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:42:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20070129222833.GB17330@elf.ucw.cz> (Pavel Machek's message of "Mon\, 29 Jan 2007 23\:28\:33 +0100") Message-ID: <87odoho3pb.fsf@gmx.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1605 Lines: 37 Pavel Machek writes: Hi! > The /proc/bus/input/devices has an extensible structure. You can just > add an "A:" line (for Activity) instead of adding a new proc file. > > I know, but IMO there is too much stuff to parse in there. Activity counters > are frequently accessed by daemons, and four or five concurrent daemons are the > norm in a typical X11 linux box... Syscalls are fast enough, and the file is _very_ easy (=> fast) to parse. > Also, the activity counters should IMO coincide with the event times > passed through /dev/input/event, and should not be jiffies based. > Ideally, both should be based on clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC). > > In evdev.c do_gettimeofday() is used. Anyway I just need of a monotonic > counter, so get_jiffies_64() wouldn't be better? It isn't affected by wrapping > issues and it is probably faster than do_gtod(). Just use same time source rest of inputs already do... OK, but what about the time-warp problem?. To fix it I need to know when the system goes to sleep/resumes. In SIN I've solved via the platform driver, introducing suspend() resume() callbacks... greets, -- Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand. - Putt's Law - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/