Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the watchdog tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220104083659.4e5f2754@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Andrej Picej <andrej.picej@norik.com>
Message-ID: <432b6c61-f8c6-368d-2386-590bed2aee7a@norik.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jan 2022 09:06:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20220104083659.4e5f2754@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Stephan,

On 3. 01. 22 22:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>    02d04e694fa3 ("watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>    Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>    - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant
> 
> Fixes: e249d01b5e8b ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
> 
> In commit
> 
>    ce3401c72f01 ("watchdog: da9063: Add hard dependency on I2C")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>    Fixes: 5ea29919c294 ("watchdog: da9063: use atomic safe i2c transfer in reset handler")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>    - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant
> 
> Fixes: 968011a291f3 ("watchdog: da9063: use atomic safe i2c transfer in reset handler")
> 

Yes, that's probably right for my patch, sorry for that.

I was puzzled on where to get the SHA1 of not-yet applied commit, 
because this patches ("watchdog: da9063: use atomic safe i2c transfer in 
reset handler" and the fix "watchdog: da9063: Add hard dependency on 
I2C") followed quite closely together. Is there any way that I can get 
the SHA1 of the commit that was applied? It should be a part of some 
branch right? I'm asking because I couldn't find a repo or a branch that 
this two commits are a part of.

Anyway should I send a v2, or what is the procedure here?

Thanks,
Andrej